A virtual court session regarding the proposed takeover of Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) by Adani Airport Holdings was disrupted by Kenyans chanting “Adani must go!” The incident, which took place during a case debating the Ksh.238 billion deal between the Indian firm and the Kenyan government, highlighted the growing power of digital activism in Kenya. The session, which was held virtually, became chaotic after the link to the hearing was shared widely on social media, rallying citizens to express their opposition to the deal.
The controversial Public Private Partnership (PPP) deal, which would see Adani Airport Holdings operate JKIA for 30 years, has drawn public criticism for its lack of transparency. The uproar surrounding the deal is part of a broader trend in Kenya, where citizens, particularly members of Generation Z, are leveraging digital platforms to demand greater government accountability and better governance.
The Rise of Digital Activism
The disruption of the JKIA hearing is not an isolated incident but part of a larger pattern of digital activism in Kenya. Social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and WhatsApp have become essential tools for Kenyans to voice their grievances and mobilize against issues they believe are detrimental to the country’s well-being.
In the case of the JKIA deal, social media played a pivotal role in spreading awareness about the court session and rallying citizens to participate. The live link to the virtual court hearing was shared across various platforms, with users urging each other to join the session and express their dissatisfaction with the proposed takeover. What followed was a display of digital civil disobedience, with chants of “Adani must go!” echoing through the virtual courtroom, effectively forcing the court to adjourn.
Justice Bahati Mwamuye, who was presiding over the case, expressed his frustration with the disruption, noting the challenges posed by virtual hearings in preventing such incidents. “My apologies counsel, this is perhaps one of the challenges we face. We’re not able to prevent these disruptions. Let us reconvene on Tuesday at 11:00 am in open court,” he ruled, adjourning the session to October 22, 2024.
The Adani-JKIA Deal: A Contentious Issue
The Ksh.238 billion deal between Adani Airport Holdings and the Kenyan government has been under scrutiny since its inception. Under the proposed agreement, the Indian firm would be responsible for upgrading and managing JKIA’s operations for the next three decades. However, the deal has been criticized for being shrouded in secrecy, with little to no public consultation or transparency regarding its terms.
Opponents of the deal argue that handing over control of one of Kenya’s most critical infrastructures to a foreign entity could have serious long-term implications for the country’s sovereignty and economic future. Critics have also raised concerns about Adani’s track record, pointing to controversies surrounding its projects in other countries, which have been linked to environmental degradation and human rights violations.
Kenyans have called for more transparency in the deal, with many questioning why the government would enter into such a significant agreement without involving key stakeholders, including the public and civil society organizations. The disruption of the court session was a manifestation of the widespread discontent surrounding the deal.
The Power of Gen Z in Kenyan Politics
The disruption of the JKIA hearing is also emblematic of the growing influence of Generation Z in Kenyan politics. This tech-savvy generation has become a formidable force in shaping political discourse and mobilizing citizens online. Unlike previous generations, Gen Z has harnessed the power of social media to demand change and hold those in power accountable.
The Gen Z movement has played a significant role in recent political developments in Kenya. For instance, in 2024, the movement was instrumental in pushing President William Ruto to withdraw the controversial Finance Bill. The bill, which proposed several tax hikes, faced massive backlash from Kenyans, with Gen Z activists leading the charge on social media. Their online campaigns quickly gained traction, forcing the government to reconsider its position.
Moreover, the movement’s influence was further demonstrated when President Ruto took the unprecedented step of firing his entire Cabinet, a move seen as a response to growing public dissatisfaction with the government’s performance. Gen Z activists were quick to celebrate the decision, viewing it as a victory for their efforts to push for better governance.
The Future of Digital Activism in Kenya
The disruption of the JKIA hearing and the rise of Gen Z as a political force signal a new era in Kenyan politics, one in which digital activism plays a central role. Social media platforms have democratized the political space, giving ordinary citizens the ability to influence policy decisions and demand accountability from their leaders.
As the government continues to push for large-scale infrastructure projects like the JKIA deal, it will need to contend with the fact that Kenyans, especially the younger generation, are watching closely. Transparency and public participation will be essential if the government hopes to avoid further backlash and disruptions like those seen in the JKIA hearing.
However, the use of digital platforms for activism also raises questions about the potential for abuse. While social media can be a powerful tool for positive change, it can also be used to spread misinformation and stoke unrest. Striking a balance between allowing citizens to express their views and maintaining order will be a challenge for both the government and the judiciary.
Conclusion
The disruption of the virtual court session debating the Adani-JKIA deal underscores the growing power of digital activism in Kenya. As citizens, led by Gen Z, continue to leverage social media to demand greater accountability from their leaders, the country’s political landscape is undergoing a profound transformation. The JKIA case, like other recent political developments, highlights the need for greater transparency and public involvement in decision-making processes, particularly when it comes to deals that could shape the nation’s future for decades to come.
As the court prepares to reconvene on October 22, all eyes will be on the outcome of the hearing. Will the public’s concerns about the Adani deal be addressed, or will the government press ahead with its plans? One thing is clear: in the age of digital activism, Kenyans are no longer passive observers—they are active participants in shaping the future of their country.
