In a bold move to address perceived inefficiencies in governance, suspended prison officer Jackson Kuria, popularly known as Cop Shakur, has proposed constitutional amendments aimed at reducing President William Ruto’s executive powers. The controversial proposal comes against the backdrop of Kuria’s active participation in anti-government protests in June last year—a move that led to his suspension.
Cop Shakur’s amendments focus on key appointments traditionally made by the president. He suggests that the positions of the Interior Cabinet Secretary, Chief Justice, and Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) should be independent from the onset. According to Kuria, the current system allows the president to influence these critical roles, which he claims undermines the impartiality of justice and the checks and balances essential for democracy.
“The Constitution gives the president too much leeway to interfere with justice,” Kuria stated, emphasizing the need for reforms to ensure these agencies can operate free from executive influence. His comments echo the sentiments of many Kenyans who have called for greater transparency and accountability in governance.
However, Kuria’s advocacy has not been without consequence. On January 15, he was arrested and arraigned the following day. Authorities accused him of several charges, including publishing false information—allegations he has denied. Despite efforts by the police to detain him for 21 days to conduct investigations, Kuria was released on a cash bail of Ksh. 50,000.
Kuria’s suspension and subsequent legal troubles have drawn mixed reactions from the public. Supporters view him as a courageous whistleblower advocating for much-needed reforms, while critics question the motives behind his activism.
His proposals come at a time of growing public dissatisfaction with the government. Many citizens have voiced concerns about the concentration of power in the presidency, which they believe has hindered the country’s democratic progress. Kuria’s suggestions, if adopted, would mark a significant shift in Kenya’s political landscape by redistributing power to ensure more accountability and independence among key state offices.
As debates over constitutional reforms gain momentum, Kuria’s proposals could spark a broader conversation about the balance of power in Kenya’s government. Whether these suggestions will lead to tangible changes remains to be seen, but they undoubtedly reflect a rising demand for a more transparent and equitable system.
