Embakasi East Member of Parliament, Babu Owino, made headlines recently for his conspicuous absence during the parliamentary session that resulted in the impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. The historic vote saw 281 MPs supporting the motion while only 44 opposed it, leading to questions about the motivations and responsibilities of those who were not present to partake in this significant political event.
In a candid post on social media platform X, Owino explained his decision to prioritize what he termed “more important matters” over the impeachment proceedings. He articulated a commitment to focus on pressing issues that affect his constituents rather than engaging in what he perceived as a politically charged debate lacking substantive outcomes for the citizens of Kenya.
“Important Matters” and Constituency Needs
Owino’s absence has been met with mixed reactions from the public and political commentators. Critics pointed out that his lack of participation in such a crucial political event raises questions about his commitment to parliamentary responsibilities. However, Owino stood firm, asserting that he could not afford to waste a whole day discussing Gachagua’s impeachment when pressing issues demanded his attention.
He emphasized that his presence in Parliament would be reserved for discussions of national importance, such as the Adani Group’s dealings in Kenya, the new university funding model, the Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF), and issues surrounding high taxation and unemployment. “How can I waste my precious whole day discussing about Rigathi yet we have serious issues like Adani, New University funding model, SHIF, high cost of living, high taxation, unemployment among others?” Owino expressed.
By framing his absence as a deliberate choice to focus on urgent matters, Owino positions himself as a representative committed to his constituents’ welfare, highlighting the disconnect he perceives between parliamentary proceedings and the realities faced by ordinary Kenyans.
The Impeachment Motion and Its Implications
The impeachment of Gachagua, initiated by Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse, marks a historic moment in Kenyan politics. The motion was based on 11 grounds, including allegations of gross misconduct, corruption, undermining the presidency, bullying, and constitutional violations. Gachagua’s two-hour defense during the parliamentary session ultimately failed to sway the majority of MPs, reflecting deep-seated frustrations with his tenure.
The National Assembly Speaker, Moses Wetangula, is now tasked with informing Senate Speaker Amason Kingi about the impeachment. Within seven days of receiving the notice, Kingi is required to convene a Senate meeting to hear the charges against Gachagua. This session can take place either in plenary or through a special committee of 11 Senators, who will investigate the matter and file a report within ten days. The Deputy President has the right to appear before the committee and be represented during these proceedings.
The political ramifications of this impeachment could be far-reaching. If the Senate supports the decision made by the National Assembly, Gachagua will officially cease to hold office. This raises questions about the stability of the current administration and the potential shift in political dynamics within the ruling coalition.
The Role of Other Absent MPs
Babu Owino was not the only MP absent during the historic vote; Kiharu MP Ndindi Nyoro was also notably missing. Their absence has drawn criticism and sparked discussions about accountability among elected representatives. Critics argue that legislators have a duty to their constituents to participate in all parliamentary matters, especially those that could significantly affect the political landscape of the country.
Nyoro and Owino’s decision to stay away from the impeachment vote, particularly without providing a clear justification during the proceedings, raises questions about their engagement with issues directly affecting Kenyans. By choosing to abstain from the discussion, they effectively sidestepped a critical moment in Kenyan politics, prompting constituents to wonder where their priorities lie.
Public Reactions and Political Commentary
The public response to Owino’s absence has been polarized. Supporters argue that he is right to prioritize the pressing issues affecting his constituents, echoing a sentiment that many politicians often lose sight of their core responsibilities amid political dramas. Critics, however, contend that any MP’s absence during an impeachment vote reflects a lack of accountability and undermines the democratic process.
Political analysts have weighed in on the implications of such absences. Some suggest that Owino’s approach might resonate with constituents who feel ignored by political elites embroiled in controversies. However, others warn that consistently opting out of parliamentary duties could diminish an MP’s influence and credibility over time.
Future Implications for Gachagua
As the Senate prepares to hear the charges against Gachagua, the political implications of the impeachment will continue to unfold. The outcome of this process could set a precedent for future parliamentary conduct and accountability in Kenya. Should the Senate uphold the impeachment, it may prompt a reevaluation of political allegiances within the ruling party and could lead to further instability.
In the backdrop of these political maneuvers, Owino’s stance will be tested. Will he continue to engage in issues pertinent to his constituents, or will he be drawn back into the political fray as events develop? His absence from this impeachment vote may reflect a broader narrative of politicians choosing to align themselves with public sentiment over party lines, a trend that could reshape the political landscape in Kenya.
Conclusion
Babu Owino’s absence from the impeachment vote of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua reflects a complex interplay between personal priorities and parliamentary responsibilities. By focusing on issues he deems more critical for his constituents, Owino embodies a growing sentiment among some lawmakers who seek to redefine their roles within the broader political discourse.
As the Senate prepares to deliberate on the charges against Gachagua, the implications of this impeachment will reverberate throughout Kenya’s political landscape. Whether Owino and other absent MPs will take this moment as an opportunity to engage more deeply with pressing national issues remains to be seen. Ultimately, the events surrounding Gachagua’s impeachment highlight the ongoing struggle between political accountability and the urgent needs of the Kenyan populace.
