The High Court has issued a conservatory order in favor of prominent city lawyer Donald B. Kipkorir, halting Muthaiga Country Club’s ban on his access to the club’s facilities. Justice Chacha Mwita’s ruling is a reprieve for Kipkorir in his ongoing dispute with the exclusive club, which he alleges has acted in a discriminatory manner.
Kipkorir’s legal team, led by lawyer Patrick Wanyama, has robustly argued that the club’s actions against Kipkorir are not only unjustified but also potentially racially and tribally motivated. The petition highlights that the club’s board is predominantly white, raising questions about systemic bias within the club’s management. Wanyama has indicated that further scrutiny might be needed, including an investigation into the immigration status of the board members.
The case began when Kipkorir, who has never sought membership at Muthaiga Country Club and does not intend to, faced repeated denials of access. Despite being invited by club members, Kipkorir was barred from entering the premises on two occasions: once in August 2024 and again in October 2022. These incidents occurred while Kipkorir was on the premises to meet clients and, in another instance, to drop off or pick up his children during a family gathering.
In his petition, Kipkorir emphasized that these denials were not only a personal affront but also had a significant impact on his professional obligations. The inability to meet clients at the club’s premises and being barred from family events has caused considerable distress. Kipkorir described his treatment during these incidents as akin to “being treated like a stray dog” and compared it to colonial-era segregation.
Kipkorir’s legal argument rests on the assertion that Kenya’s Constitution guarantees citizens’ rights, which cannot be undermined by private entities such as Muthaiga Country Club. His petition draws attention to the contrast between modern democratic values and the allegedly discriminatory practices of the club, which he likens to a “colonial relic” in today’s Kenya.
The High Court’s conservatory order ensures that Muthaiga Country Club cannot deny Kipkorir access if he is invited by a member. This interim relief is critical as the legal battle continues, and Kipkorir’s team is seeking not only damages for the alleged constitutional rights violation but also a permanent injunction against future denial of access.
This case raises important questions about the intersection of private club policies and constitutional rights in Kenya. It highlights the broader issue of how private entities, particularly those with a history of exclusivity, must navigate the legal landscape of a constitutional democracy where fundamental rights are paramount.
Kipkorir’s legal team has argued that the club’s actions represent a troubling form of exclusion that is incompatible with Kenya’s constitutional values. They are calling for accountability under the Bill of Rights, which can be enforced against private institutions that violate citizens’ rights.
As this case progresses, it will likely serve as a crucial test of how private institutions are expected to align with the constitutional guarantees of equality and non-discrimination. For now, Kipkorir’s temporary victory allows him the freedom to access Muthaiga Country Club, provided he is invited by a member, and sets the stage for a more comprehensive legal review of the club’s practices.
