Elon Musk’s acquisition of X, formerly Twitter, has not been without its controversies, and his challenges are now extending beyond Brazil to the European Union (EU). As the EU considers potential sanctions against X for allegedly violating new content rules, the clash between Musk’s “free speech absolutist” stance and the EU’s regulatory framework is intensifying.
Since Saturday, access to X has been suspended in Brazil following a prolonged legal battle over disinformation. A judge’s order has led to a shutdown, highlighting the country’s severe stance on content moderation issues. Yet, Brazil’s actions are just one facet of a broader global scrutiny that Musk’s X faces.
Politicians and digital rights organizations worldwide have expressed growing concerns about Musk’s management of X, particularly after his decision to significantly cut back on the platform’s content moderation staff and his contentious relationship with EU regulators. The Digital Services Act (DSA), a landmark piece of legislation designed to tackle online misinformation and harmful content, is central to the EU’s current scrutiny of X.
The DSA mandates stringent content moderation requirements and transparency for online platforms, and non-compliance could lead to hefty fines. The European Commission, the EU’s digital watchdog, has indicated that X could face fines up to 6% of its global annual turnover if found in breach of these regulations. The ongoing investigation into X’s adherence to the DSA includes accusations of deceptive practices, insufficient transparency in advertising, and failures in providing researchers access to critical data.
Musk’s response to the EU’s accusations has been combative. When the EU accused X of deceptive practices in July, Musk retorted with a warning of a “very public battle in court.” This confrontation escalated further when Musk publicly mocked Thierry Breton, the EU’s top tech enforcer, after Breton’s reminder of X’s legal duty to curb harmful content. Musk’s retorts and public disputes with EU officials have heightened tensions and set the stage for a potential legal showdown.
Despite the heightened rhetoric, an outright ban of X across the 27 EU member states remains unlikely. The DSA does grant the EU the authority to request a temporary suspension of services from a platform if it fails to comply with regulations. However, given X’s extensive user base of around 106 million in the EU, such a drastic measure would be fraught with complexities and potentially severe repercussions for freedom of expression and access to information.
Experts and digital rights advocates suggest that while a ban is legally possible, it is seen as a last resort. Alexandre de Streel from the Centre on Regulation in Europe points out that while a ban cannot be entirely ruled out, it is considered very unlikely. The EU is expected to prioritize dialogue and incremental measures before considering such drastic actions.
Jan Penfrat from the European Digital Rights advocacy group echoes this sentiment, emphasizing that a ban would be an extreme step with significant negative implications for free expression. The ongoing investigation into X’s practices is likely to continue, with the company given opportunities to respond to the EU’s findings.
The growing list of governments critical of Musk and X further complicates the situation. In the UK, Musk has faced backlash over inflammatory posts and his handling of misinformation during recent riots. The UK, set to introduce legislation similar to the DSA next year, may also intensify scrutiny on X.
As the EU’s investigation unfolds, the future of X in Europe remains uncertain. While a confrontation with EU regulators seems inevitable, the resolution may involve a combination of fines, regulatory adjustments, and ongoing legal battles rather than an outright ban. For now, the world watches closely as Musk navigates this complex and high-stakes regulatory landscape.
