Khalif Kairo a local car dealer, currently facing multiple fraud-related accusations, has come forward with claims of harassment by a high-ranking official in the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI). He alleges that this official has used his influence to ensure a series of arrests and deny him bail, significantly impacting his business and personal life.
The issue began when a vehicle transaction involving the official’s niece failed to materialize as expected. Since then, the dealer has been repeatedly arrested and taken through a grueling legal process. He asserts that vehicle delivery delays should be treated as civil disputes rather than criminal cases, and he has been working tirelessly to resolve any outstanding concerns with his clients.
He describes a pattern of targeted frustration, citing an instance where the official’s niece was present during his previous arrests, taking videos inside the police station and sharing them with bloggers. He claims that she has been using her uncle’s influence to manipulate law enforcement officers, ensuring that he remains in custody for extended periods without justifiable cause. This interference, he believes, has made it difficult for him to secure bail and has led to the unnecessary escalation of his legal troubles.
In January, following one of his arrests, he managed to post a significant bail amount, and his legal team requested the consolidation of all pending cases. This move was intended to allow for a structured resolution of all outstanding disputes, preventing unnecessary multiple legal proceedings. Despite these efforts, he was arrested again while addressing related legal matters, with officers allegedly refusing to process his case at the designated court. Instead, they opted to transfer his case to a different jurisdiction, which resulted in additional financial strain and the possibility of remand.
The dealer insists that the objective behind these actions is not justice but rather personal vendetta and intimidation. The continuous interference has forced him to shut down his business operations, lay off his employees, and ultimately delay pending vehicle deliveries. He maintains his commitment to fulfilling his obligations to clients but finds the harassment by certain individuals within law enforcement detrimental to his ability to do so.
Furthermore, he expresses frustration over how the actions of one individual with governmental ties can dismantle years of hard work. The frequent arrests have led to a loss of confidence among investors and financial institutions, making it even harder for him to recover and address the outstanding concerns of his clients. He emphasizes the importance of handling commercial disputes through civil courts, rather than allowing personal influence to turn them into criminal cases.
To counter the alleged injustices, his legal team has filed a constitutional appeal, seeking a review of the criminal proceedings against him. He argues that every arrest and subsequent detention make it increasingly difficult for him to resolve the situation, pushing him closer to financial ruin.
In a direct appeal, he calls upon anyone with grievances against him to formally file their complaints at the appropriate police station so that all cases can be addressed collectively. He asserts that he is no longer afraid and is prepared to face any allegations in an open and transparent manner.
He also highlights a previous threat he received from the official’s niece, pointing out that her words have materialized exactly as she had predicted. He believes that this demonstrates the premeditated nature of his persecution and demands that his rights be upheld.
Ultimately, he remains steadfast in his desire to resolve his business disputes in a fair and legal manner, urging authorities to ensure that justice is served without undue influence or manipulation.
