Lawmakers in Kenya are advocating for the extension of the Equalization Fund by an additional 10 years, citing unfulfilled objectives since its establishment under the 2010 Constitution. The fund, set to expire in 2030, was designed to uplift 14 marginalized counties by addressing infrastructure gaps and improving access to essential services such as roads, water, health facilities, and electricity.
During a parliamentary debate on the Equalization Fund Administration Bill 2023, legislators highlighted several challenges that have hindered the full implementation of the fund’s objectives. Chief among them were bureaucratic delays and corruption at the county level, which they argued have significantly stalled progress in targeted regions.
The Equalization Fund has faced inefficiencies due to mismanagement and a lack of proper oversight, with MPs insisting that corruption within county administrations has obstructed effective utilization. They stressed the need for streamlined fund management to prevent further wastage and ensure that the financial resources reach their intended beneficiaries.
Additionally, the lawmakers proposed a review of the criteria used to determine which counties benefit from the fund. This, they argue, will help eliminate inefficiencies and ensure that the most deserving regions receive adequate financial support. The suggested amendments aim to make the fund more impactful by channeling resources where they are most needed.
The Equalization Fund Administration Bill 2023 proposes that the fund remains active for a further non-renewable term of 10 years beyond its current expiration date in 2030. If the Bill is passed, the fund will continue until 2040, giving marginalized counties more time to develop critical infrastructure and essential services.
The 14 counties currently benefiting from the fund include Turkana, Lamu, Mandera, Wajir, Marsabit, Samburu, West Pokot, Tana River, Narok, Kwale, Garissa, Kilifi, Taita Taveta, and Isiolo. These regions, historically underdeveloped, rely on the fund to bridge disparities in economic and social development.
While the push for the fund’s extension has gained traction, questions remain about accountability and effectiveness in utilizing these funds. Stakeholders have called for enhanced oversight mechanisms to curb misuse and ensure that funds are used strictly for their intended purpose.
As the debate continues, the focus remains on ensuring that marginalized communities receive equitable development opportunities. The fate of the Equalization Fund now rests on legislative action and the government’s commitment to addressing historical inequalities.
