Guinea’s transitional authorities have introduced a draft of a new constitution that aims to reduce and limit presidential terms. This proposal could mark a significant step towards stabilizing the West African nation and potentially pave the way for a return to constitutional rule. The draft, presented on Monday at the National Transitional Council (NTC), has raised both hope and skepticism among the populace and international observers.
Background
In 2021, Guinea experienced a significant political upheaval when a military coup led by Colonel Mamady Doumbouya ousted President Alpha Conde. Conde, who had been in power since 2010, incited widespread unrest by amending the constitution to allow himself to run for a third term in 2020. His actions triggered massive protests and increased political instability, culminating in the coup.
Following the takeover, the junta proposed a two-year transition period to elections after negotiations with the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). However, the junta has shown little sign of organizing elections within the proposed timeframe, leading to concerns about their commitment to a democratic transition.
The New Draft Constitution
The draft constitution proposes a significant change by setting presidential terms to five years, renewable once. This amendment reduces the term from the six years established in the 2020 constitution. Importantly, the draft does not prohibit members of the ruling junta from participating in the electoral process, potentially allowing Doumbouya to run in the next presidential election.
The draft also includes an age limit for presidential candidates, which would exclude former President Alpha Conde, now 86, from running again. This clause seems to be a direct response to the instability caused by Conde’s extended grip on power.
Potential Impact
If approved, the new constitution could herald a return to democratic governance in Guinea. The reduced presidential term limits aim to prevent the entrenchment of power and promote regular political renewal. This change could help restore public confidence in the political system and reduce the likelihood of future coups.
However, the draft constitution’s allowance for junta members to run in elections has raised concerns. Critics argue that this could perpetuate military influence in politics, undermining the very democratic principles the new constitution seeks to establish. The timing and fairness of the upcoming referendum and subsequent elections will be crucial in determining whether the transition is genuinely democratic or a mere façade.
International and Domestic Reactions
International reactions to the draft constitution have been mixed. ECOWAS and other international bodies have emphasized the importance of a timely and transparent transition to civilian rule. They have called for clear timelines for elections and safeguards to ensure they are free and fair.
Domestically, the draft has sparked a range of reactions. Some Guineans view it as a positive step towards ending the political crisis and restoring order. Others remain skeptical, fearing that the junta’s participation in elections could entrench military power under the guise of constitutional reform.
Moving Forward
As Guinea prepares for a referendum on the new constitution, the world will be watching closely. The outcome will significantly impact Guinea’s political future and set a precedent for other West African nations grappling with similar issues. A successful transition to a stable, democratic government could serve as a model for the region and contribute to broader stability in West Africa.
For now, Guinea stands at a crossroads. The new draft constitution offers a potential path towards democratic renewal, but its implementation and the conduct of upcoming elections will be critical in determining whether this potential is realized. The international community and Guineans alike will be hoping for a peaceful and genuine return to constitutional order.
