Maryland’s ambitious climate action plans for 2025 are hitting some harsh realities as state agencies strive to turn their green aspirations into action. Despite a strong executive order from Governor Wes Moore, outlining sweeping emissions reduction targets and a clean energy future, the path ahead is fraught with financial uncertainties, workforce shortages, and tough deadlines that could hinder progress.
Last June, Gov. Moore signed an executive order that set in motion a series of climate action plans, with agencies required to submit their proposals by November 1. As part of these efforts, a new climate subcabinet was established, chaired by Serena McIlwain, the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). McIlwain’s role is to guide the state’s efforts and report annually on its progress toward meeting ambitious climate goals.
In November, MDE unveiled a bold plan created by 25 state agencies, targeting over 100 actions to reduce emissions, promote clean energy, and ensure an equitable transition to a fossil-free economy. Moore’s message was clear: Maryland can and must build a sustainable economy while maintaining growth. The plans cover a wide range of sectors including energy, transportation, natural resources, and buildings. While the goals are laudable, they rely heavily on federal funding, which remains uncertain due to fluctuating political landscapes.
One of the biggest challenges Maryland faces in meeting these targets is staffing. Many agencies, such as the Department of Transportation (MDOT) and the Department of Agriculture, emphasize the need for additional personnel to handle the enormous workload required. However, few have outlined concrete plans to address these staffing needs or invest in workforce development.
Another significant hurdle is the reliance on federal grants, which were notably unstable during the previous administration. This uncertainty is a particular concern for programs like the Zero-Emission Heating Equipment Standard and the Clean Heat Standard. These programs depend on stakeholder engagement, but the lack of a clear, consistent funding stream could delay their implementation. The same can be said for the cap-and-trade program aimed at limiting carbon emissions from power plants. While Maryland is pushing for stricter regulations, the program’s success depends on the cooperation of other states, a factor outside of Maryland’s control.
Equity and environmental justice have been emphasized in the climate plans, with a focus on underserved communities. The Maryland Energy Administration plans to allocate $70 million to support low-income and vulnerable populations through programs like community solar initiatives and electric vehicle infrastructure. However, without stable funding and a robust public awareness campaign, these programs may struggle to make a significant impact.
With aggressive deadlines set for 2025, Maryland’s climate ambitions are at risk of being undermined by these operational challenges. Tight timelines for implementing zero-emission vehicles in schools and adopting energy-efficient building standards have already sparked concerns. Schools have requested waivers, citing lack of infrastructure and funding, suggesting that these ambitious goals might be difficult to meet within the set timeframe.
While Maryland has certainly made strides in recognizing the need for climate action, the state’s ability to deliver on these plans will depend heavily on securing stable federal funding, addressing staffing gaps, and finding practical ways to involve the public in the transition. Without these essential ingredients, the bold climate vision set out by the state may fall short of its true potential.
