The government has mandated the nationwide removal of asbestos from both public and private buildings in an effort to address the significant health risks associated with prolonged exposure to the hazardous material. This directive, which was recently approved by the Cabinet, requires property owners to finance the removal and disposal process as part of their environmental and public health responsibilities. The move comes amid growing concerns about the prevalence of asbestos-containing structures across the country and the potential health consequences for occupants and the wider population.
To ensure the safe and effective execution of this directive, the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) has been tasked with overseeing the entire process, from removal to safe disposal. Additionally, county governments have been directed to set up designated disposal sites that will handle asbestos waste in a manner that prevents further environmental contamination. The policy follows the ‘polluter pays’ principle, which places the financial responsibility for asbestos removal on property owners rather than the government. Officials argue that this approach will not only protect public health but also reduce long-term healthcare costs by minimizing asbestos-related illnesses.
The issue of asbestos in Kenyan buildings is not new. Last year, Environment Cabinet Secretary Aden Duale issued a directive requiring all government institutions, including Kenya Railways Corporation, Kenyatta University, Kenyatta National Hospital, and the Kenya Medical Training College, to remove asbestos roofing by December 31, 2024. The directive was based on a nationwide survey conducted by NEMA, which revealed a significant number of government-owned buildings still using asbestos materials, particularly in urban areas such as Nairobi. Despite a ban on asbestos in 2006, many structures continue to have asbestos roofing, which poses a serious risk when the material deteriorates and releases fibers into the air.
During a recent appearance before the National Assembly’s Petitions Committee, Duale emphasized the urgency of addressing the issue. He acknowledged that previous administrations had failed to prioritize asbestos removal, allowing the problem to persist for years. He further explained that exposure to asbestos, particularly through contaminated rainwater collected from roofs, poses a direct health hazard to thousands of Kenyans. In response to lawmakers’ concerns about the financial burden of removal, Duale reiterated that the government was committed to finding solutions, including mobilizing resources and ensuring proper oversight.
One of the main challenges faced in previous asbestos removal efforts has been financial constraints. Despite several government initiatives to eliminate the material, progress has been slow due to a lack of dedicated funds. Duale assured legislators that his ministry, in collaboration with other government agencies, would push for the necessary budgetary allocations to fast-track the process. He also indicated that a Cabinet memo would be prepared to ensure the matter receives the highest level of priority.
The dangers associated with asbestos exposure are well-documented. Scientific studies have linked inhalation of asbestos fibers to various forms of cancer, including lung cancer, laryngeal cancer, and ovarian cancer. The material was widely used in construction due to its durability and resistance to heat, chemicals, and corrosion. However, as buildings age, asbestos-containing materials begin to degrade, increasing the likelihood of fiber release into the air. This is particularly concerning in institutions such as hospitals, schools, and government offices, where large numbers of people are exposed daily.
The government’s renewed push to eliminate asbestos is expected to be met with challenges, particularly from property owners who may struggle to cover the removal costs. However, the Ministry of Environment has urged compliance, emphasizing that public health and safety must take precedence over financial concerns. Authorities have also warned that failure to comply with the directive could lead to legal consequences, as asbestos contamination falls under hazardous waste regulations.
As the country moves forward with implementation, NEMA and other regulatory bodies will continue monitoring compliance levels while providing technical guidance on safe removal and disposal practices. The success of this initiative will not only contribute to better public health outcomes but also ensure that future generations are not exposed to the risks associated with asbestos.
