The High Court in Nairobi has issued a directive compelling the unconditional release of six abducted individuals, following an application by the Law Society of Kenya (LSK). Justice Bahati Mwamuye, presiding over the matter, ordered the Inspector General of Police (IG) Douglas Kanja and eight other state agencies to present the six individuals before the court on Tuesday at 11:00 a.m.
The six individuals, identified as Peter Muteti, Bernard Kavuli, Billy Mwangi, Gideon Kibet, Rony Kiplangat, and Steve Kavingo, were reportedly abducted under unclear circumstances. The LSK sought immediate intervention, citing a gross violation of their constitutional rights, including unlawful detention and forced disappearance.
Justice Mwamuye’s order explicitly requires the IG to ensure compliance both in his personal and official capacity. Furthermore, the court instructed the apex leaders of all implicated constitutional bodies to appear during the full hearing to address allegations of arbitrary infringement on fundamental rights.
The state bodies named in the directive include the National Police Service, the Ministry of Interior and National Coordination, the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI), the National Intelligence Service (NIS), the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), and the Attorney General’s office. These entities are expected to provide explanations regarding their roles, if any, in the abductions.
This case has sparked widespread attention, highlighting concerns over abuse of power and disregard for human rights. The LSK contends that the abductions represent a dangerous trend of arbitrary actions sanctioned by those entrusted with upholding the law.
The court’s decision underscores the judiciary’s role as a safeguard for constitutional rights, reinforcing the rule of law. As the scheduled hearing approaches, the nation awaits a transparent account of the circumstances leading to the individuals’ disappearance.
This order serves as a crucial reminder of the state’s duty to protect its citizens while upholding accountability for actions taken under its command. Failure to comply with the court’s directive could result in severe legal repercussions for the implicated officials and institutions.
