The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) has defended its decision to clear John Chebochok, who has been accused of sexual exploitation, to run for the position of zonal director at the Tegat/Toror Tea Factory. The IEBC stated that Chebochok presented all the required documents and received clearance from the police, meeting all the necessary legal requirements for his candidacy.
In a statement issued on July 4, the IEBC emphasized its role in ensuring that all candidates meet the legal qualifications for electoral positions. “John Chebochok submitted all the necessary documents, including a certificate of good conduct from the police, which confirmed that he met the legal criteria to run for the position,” the commission stated.
The IEBC further clarified that it does not have the mandate to investigate or adjudicate criminal allegations, which fall under the jurisdiction of law enforcement agencies and the judiciary. “Our mandate is to verify that candidates have fulfilled the legal requirements for the positions they are contesting. Any allegations of criminal conduct are matters for the police and the courts to address,” the statement added.
The clearance of Chebochok has sparked controversy and public outcry, with many questioning the decision in light of the serious allegations against him. Critics argue that allowing individuals accused of such offenses to run for public office undermines the integrity of the electoral process and the trust of the community.
In response to these concerns, the IEBC reiterated its commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring fair and transparent elections. “We are bound by the legal framework governing elections and must operate within those parameters. We encourage any aggrieved parties to pursue legal action through the appropriate channels,” the commission urged.
The controversy surrounding Chebochok’s candidacy has also highlighted the broader issue of vetting processes for candidates seeking public office. Many are calling for stricter regulations and more comprehensive background checks to prevent individuals with serious allegations or criminal histories from holding positions of authority.
The IEBC’s decision underscores the complex interplay between legal requirements, due process, and public perception in the electoral process. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the allegations against Chebochok will impact his campaign and the broader discussions on electoral integrity and accountability.
