The Institute of Engineers of Kenya (IEK) is advocating for the government to shift Kenya Power’s power system control functions to an independent system operator (ISO), aiming to enhance transparency and reduce conflicts of interest within Kenya’s energy sector. IEK President Shammah Kiteme highlighted that establishing an ISO, in line with the Energy Act 2019, would provide equitable access to the grid for all electricity generators and ensure impartial dispatch management in the national electricity grid.
Need for Independence in Power System Management
IEK’s recommendation to decouple Kenya Power’s control functions stems from the utility’s current role in overseeing both distribution and the monitoring of national grid activities. Kenya Power holds a centralized role, with visibility into all grid-related activities, including access to generation and transmission data managed by Kenya Electricity Transmission Company (KETRACO). According to IEK, this setup creates a potential conflict of interest, as Kenya Power’s dual role in distribution and grid control can disadvantage competing electricity generators.
“Promoting transparency and equitable access is essential,” said Kiteme. “An independent system operator would remove any bias toward Kenya Power’s interests as a distributor, leveling the playing field for other electricity providers.”
By establishing an ISO, IEK expects to introduce more competition into the electricity market, which could attract further investment in the sector. With a more open grid, smaller energy producers could have a more viable path to compete with Kenya Power, leading to a diversified and potentially more resilient energy landscape. Enhanced competition could also drive efficiency and encourage innovation, factors that are often hampered in monopolistic setups.
Challenges With Kenya Power’s Current Role
The central role of Kenya Power has also been a point of concern due to Kenya’s frequent power outages. The IEK suggests that many of these blackouts are linked to dispatch issues that could be addressed through a more impartial system. By transitioning to an independent ISO, power generation dispatch decisions would likely be made without undue influence, improving reliability in electricity supply.
Kenya Power’s vast responsibilities in grid management have compounded these issues, with the company overseeing every stage from transmission to distribution. The IEK argues that unbundling these roles would allow for a more streamlined approach where a separate entity would focus exclusively on grid control. This could ensure that the national control system operates with a balanced view of all grid participants rather than favoring Kenya Power’s distribution needs.
Cost and Efficiency Considerations
While setting up an ISO may appear resource-intensive, the IEK suggests a pragmatic approach: rather than creating a new infrastructure from scratch, the government could reconfigure Kenya Power’s existing control center to operate independently. This strategy would help reduce redundancy and control costs, leveraging Kenya Power’s established facilities and expertise while minimizing disruptions to the grid’s operational framework.
Kiteme stated, “This approach would reduce costs and allow the government to use existing infrastructure and technical know-how.” He added that this method would streamline the transition while balancing financial implications, as opposed to building a standalone facility.
Should the restructuring be implemented, the government would need to ensure that the ISO maintains complete operational independence from Kenya Power. An effective regulatory framework would be essential to guarantee unbiased dispatch operations, reinforcing confidence among stakeholders that the ISO acts impartially.
Expected Benefits of an Independent System Operator
The IEK envisions that an ISO would not only bring fairness but also promote long-term stability in Kenya’s energy supply. By fostering open market access, it could spur more investments in renewable energy, a sector where smaller producers could compete effectively. An open grid encourages providers of wind, solar, and other green energy to enter the market, supporting Kenya’s sustainable energy goals.
Additionally, an independent operator could pave the way for a more resilient grid, capable of minimizing outages and balancing supply-demand dynamics effectively. With improved grid reliability and a competitive market, consumers could also experience more stable electricity prices.
Conclusion
The IEK’s call to separate Kenya Power’s grid management role aligns with a broader vision for a competitive and sustainable energy sector in Kenya. Creating an independent system operator is not only a legal mandate under the Energy Act 2019 but also a strategic shift that promises improved reliability, market competitiveness, and investment growth. If implemented with regulatory rigor, the ISO could catalyze significant advancements in Kenya’s power sector, creating an environment conducive to efficiency and innovation. As Kenya navigates its energy challenges, the government’s decision on this matter could shape the country’s energy future for years to come.
