India’s Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has firmly rebutted accusations of bias leveled by the U.S.-based short-seller Hindenburg Research. The allegations, which surfaced over the weekend, claim that SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch’s past offshore investments could have influenced the regulator’s investigation into the Adani Group, a sprawling Indian conglomerate embroiled in a major financial scandal.
Last year, the Adani Group, founded by Gautam Adani, the world’s 12th richest individual, experienced a dramatic loss in market value. This was triggered by a damning report from Hindenburg Research, which accused the conglomerate of “brazen” corporate fraud. The report alleged widespread financial misconduct, including the use of offshore shell entities managed by Adani’s elder brother, Vinod Adani, across various tax havens.
The fallout from the report was significant, with over $150 billion erased from the Adani Group’s market capitalization. This turmoil prompted India’s Supreme Court to mandate an investigation into the allegations. However, recent claims by Hindenburg have intensified the controversy, suggesting that SEBI’s investigation may have been compromised due to Buch’s alleged connections to offshore funds linked to Vinod Adani.
According to Hindenburg, Buch and her husband had investments in offshore funds that also purportedly involved entities associated with Vinod Adani. The report insinuated that Buch’s past financial dealings might have caused SEBI to hesitate in pursuing the investigation fully. It was claimed that the Buch couple opened their account in an offshore fund in 2015, just before Buch’s appointment as a “whole-time member” of SEBI in 2017. The report suggested that Buch’s appointment as SEBI Chairperson in 2022 might have further complicated the regulator’s ability to address the allegations impartially.
In response, Madhabi Puri Buch has vehemently denied these accusations. In a statement issued on Saturday, she labeled the allegations as “baseless” and “insinuations,” asserting that both her and her husband’s financial affairs have always been transparent. Buch emphasized that all required disclosures had been made to SEBI over the years and reiterated her commitment to transparency. “We have no hesitation in disclosing any and all financial documents, including those that relate to the period when we were strictly private citizens, to any and every authority that may seek them,” she declared.
The accusations against SEBI come amidst a backdrop of intense scrutiny of the Adani Group’s operations. The conglomerate’s close ties with Prime Minister Narendra Modi have been a focal point for opposition parties and critics, who argue that this relationship may have played a role in facilitating Adani’s rise and shielding him from rigorous oversight.
As the investigation into the Adani Group continues, the latest allegations against SEBI highlight the complex interplay of politics, business, and regulatory oversight in India. The outcome of this scrutiny will not only impact the Adani Group but also shape the broader discourse on corporate governance and regulatory practices in the country.
The allegations of bias by Hindenburg and SEBI’s rebuttal underscore the challenges faced by regulatory bodies in maintaining their integrity while navigating high-stakes corporate investigations. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing debates about the extent of SEBI’s independence and the broader implications for corporate accountability in India.
