Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology (JOOUST) has responded to a series of allegations, including irregular clearance of students for graduation, amid scrutiny by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC). The university’s vice chancellor, Prof. Emily Akuno, released a statement on the matter, addressing the claims and providing clarity on the ongoing issues.
The allegations, which first came to light through media reports attributed to the EACC, claimed that the university’s Senate had irregularly cleared 200 students for graduation during the October 18, 2024 ceremony. However, JOOUST has denied these allegations, explaining that while some students’ names mistakenly appeared on the preliminary graduation list, the error was promptly corrected.
“We wish to clarify that due to stringent internal controls, including a robust whistle-blowing policy, the university noticed that some students’ names were appearing in the preliminary graduation list when they ought not to,” Prof. Akuno stated in her message. She further emphasized that the names of these students were expunged, and a thorough internal audit was conducted post-graduation to ensure all the graduands were eligible for the ceremony.
In an effort to maintain transparency and ensure the legitimacy of the graduation process, the university confirmed the involvement of the EACC in the verification of the graduands before certificates are issued. Akuno mentioned that the commission would expedite the process to instill additional rigor, providing assurance to the public that only deserving students would receive their diplomas.
In a related matter, the university also addressed a land ownership dispute that had surfaced following claims by a resident from Bondo. The resident had alleged that JOOUST had not compensated the rightful landowner for the property on which the institution sits. Prof. Akuno responded firmly, asserting that the university holds a valid title deed for the land, which legally affirms its ownership. She dismissed the claims, stating that the university is the rightful custodian of the land and any concerns regarding compensation should be directed to the relevant government authorities.
“The University is a custodian of this land. As such, any issues regarding purported ownership or lack of compensation should be directed to relevant government bodies,” Akuno said, reinforcing the university’s legal standing on the matter.
Furthermore, the Vice Chancellor addressed an ongoing investigation into the university’s capital projects. The EACC had launched a probe into the institution’s capital expenditure, which has sparked public concern. In her statement, Akuno confirmed that the matter is currently under judicial review and is being handled by the courts. She emphasized that the university would fully cooperate with the investigative agencies, but she refrained from making further comments, as doing so could potentially jeopardize the legal proceedings.
“As such, we are unable to comment further as this would jeopardise the ongoing process,” Akuno stated, highlighting the university’s commitment to a transparent and lawful resolution of the matter.
The series of allegations and investigations surrounding Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology have raised concerns in the public domain. However, the university’s administration has expressed its dedication to upholding the integrity of its operations, particularly in ensuring the fair treatment of its students and the responsible management of its resources.
As the investigations continue, the university’s leadership has called for patience and trust in the ongoing processes, assuring the public that any irregularities will be swiftly addressed. With cooperation from the EACC and other relevant authorities, JOOUST is committed to restoring confidence in its operations and upholding the values of accountability, transparency, and fairness.
In conclusion, while Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology has faced challenges regarding the irregular clearance of students, land ownership disputes, and capital project investigations, the university’s swift actions and commitment to working with regulatory bodies reflect its determination to resolve these issues and maintain its standing as a reputable institution.
