On Monday, Justice Stella Mutuku delivered a judgment, finding that the killing of a journalist on October 23, 2022, constituted a grave violation of multiple fundamental rights. The court determined that the incident infringed upon the scribe’s right to life, right to equal benefit and protection under the law, and right to dignity, among other protections.
Justice Mutuku’s ruling emphasized the severity and unlawfulness of the killing, highlighting the broader implications for human rights and justice in the country. “The killing not only deprived an individual of life but also undermined the very principles of equality, legal protection, and human dignity that our legal system is built upon,” Mutuku stated.
The scribe, whose identity has been withheld for privacy and security reasons, was reportedly targeted due to their work in exposing corruption and malpractice within influential circles. The court acknowledged the brave efforts of journalists in holding power to account and underscored the critical need to protect such individuals from harm.
“The right to life is paramount and non-negotiable,” Justice Mutuku declared. “Any action that seeks to undermine this right must be met with the full force of justice. The court will not tolerate any form of impunity, especially when it comes to protecting those who serve the public interest through their work.”
In addition to affirming the violation of the scribe’s right to life, the judgment also addressed the broader context of rights that were breached. The court found that the journalist’s right to equal benefit and protection of the law was compromised, reflecting a failure on the part of law enforcement and other relevant authorities to provide adequate security and support.
“The principle of equal protection under the law mandates that every individual, regardless of their profession or background, is entitled to safety and justice,” Mutuku elaborated. “The failure to uphold this principle, particularly in cases involving threats to life, must be rectified to restore public confidence in our legal and protective systems.”
Furthermore, the court recognized the infringement upon the journalist’s right to dignity. “Human dignity is a cornerstone of our constitutional framework,” Justice Mutuku noted. “The actions that led to the scribe’s death were not only a physical assault but also a direct affront to their inherent dignity as a human being.”
The ruling has significant implications for ongoing efforts to safeguard the rights and lives of journalists and other vulnerable individuals in the country. Advocacy groups have hailed the judgment as a crucial step towards greater accountability and protection for those who courageously expose wrongdoing.
“This decision sends a powerful message that the judicial system stands firmly against any form of violence or intimidation directed at journalists,” said a spokesperson for a leading human rights organization. “It reinforces the idea that justice will be pursued relentlessly, and that the rights enshrined in our constitution are not mere words but actionable guarantees.”
The court has called for a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding the killing, with a directive for law enforcement agencies to ensure that those responsible are brought to justice. The ruling also includes recommendations for enhancing protective measures for journalists and strengthening legal frameworks to prevent similar violations in the future.
As the case progresses, it remains a focal point for discussions on press freedom, human rights, and the role of the judiciary in upholding these essential principles. Justice Mutuku’s verdict marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle for justice and accountability in the face of adversity and violence.
