The Kenyan government has dropped plans to require all tourists entering the country to declare their mobile phone International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) numbers. The decision comes after widespread public concerns regarding privacy and the potential economic impact on tourism. Initially set to take effect on January 1, 2025, the policy had been introduced by the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) as part of efforts to curb the rising number of unregistered mobile phones entering the country, which bypassed tax payments and safety regulations.
The policy’s primary objective was to ensure that mobile devices entering the country comply with local tax and safety standards, thereby safeguarding the interests of both consumers and the broader economy. By requiring tourists to declare the IMEI numbers of their phones upon arrival, the KRA aimed to better track unregistered devices, which are often associated with the gray market. These unregistered phones not only evade taxes but can also present a security risk if they do not meet the necessary quality and safety standards.
However, the plan was met with significant resistance. Many Kenyans and stakeholders in the tourism industry raised concerns about the potential negative effects on the country’s tourism sector, which has been recovering steadily following the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic. The tourism sector had been counting on easing travel restrictions and improving accessibility to attract more international visitors, and the new policy was viewed by some as an unnecessary hurdle.
Addressing the concerns, Tourism Cabinet Secretary (CS) Rebecca Miano announced that the government would not move forward with the requirement for tourists to declare their phone IMEI numbers. Miano emphasized that the decision was in line with Kenya’s commitment to remain an attractive and accessible destination for international visitors. “KRA has announced that tourists will NOT be required to declare their gadgets’ IMEI numbers upon arrival,” Miano stated. She further explained that Kenya’s strategic location as the “gateway to East Africa” positions it as a regional hub for tourism and business, making it imperative that the country remain welcoming to foreign travelers.
The announcement followed extensive consultations with relevant stakeholders, including the Communications Authority of Kenya (CAK), KRA, and lawmakers. The government sought to strike a balance between ensuring that mobile devices entering the country meet regulatory standards and maintaining Kenya’s competitive edge as a tourism destination.
Before the policy was scrapped, discussions surrounding the proposal had highlighted privacy concerns. During a session of the National Assembly’s Committee on Communication, Information, and Innovation, lawmakers questioned whether the KRA’s proposal would infringe upon privacy laws, particularly related to data protection. Communications Authority Director General David Mugonyi addressed these concerns, assuring the public that KRA would not access personal data from the mobile devices of tourists. “This engagement has nothing to do with the transactions we carry out on our phones. We want to ensure the right products are in the country, and the tax compliance aspect is strictly for that. KRA will not have access to people’s data,” Mugonyi clarified.
Despite these reassurances, the backlash continued, particularly from within the tourism industry, which feared that the new policy could deter tourists from visiting Kenya. Some argued that the implementation of such a measure could be cumbersome for tourists and negatively affect their overall experience in the country. With Kenya’s reliance on tourism for foreign exchange and job creation, maintaining an open and welcoming environment is crucial.
The decision to abandon the IMEI declaration requirement reflects a broader recognition of the need to balance regulatory goals with the realities of the global tourism industry. As the government continues to seek solutions to the challenges posed by unregistered mobile devices, it is clear that any future policies will need to address both the concerns of industry stakeholders and the rights of individuals.
In conclusion, the Kenyan government’s decision to drop the plan to require tourists to declare their mobile phone IMEI numbers represents a pragmatic approach aimed at safeguarding both the interests of the nation and the livelihoods of those dependent on the tourism sector. With the policy’s cancellation, Kenya is likely to remain a competitive and attractive destination for tourists, positioning itself as a hub for business and leisure in the East African region.
