Former Chief Justice David Maraga has strongly criticized the Kenyan government following revelations that billions of shillings collected through the Electronic Travel Authorization (eTA) program were deposited in Swiss bank accounts. The controversy arose after Government Spokesperson Isaac Mwaura confirmed that a Swiss company involved in the eTA pilot phase received the funds, claiming the arrangement was temporary.
Mwaura assured the public that future eTA revenues would be channeled directly into Kenya’s Consolidated Fund. However, Maraga, in a scathing statement on X (formerly Twitter), questioned the legality and transparency of the deal, accusing the government of constitutional violations.
“This is yet another flagrant violation of the Constitution, which mandates that all public funds be deposited in the Consolidated Fund,” Maraga stated. He demanded answers, asking, “When did Parliament approve this pilot? Why offshore Swiss accounts with their history of secrecy? Who are the signatories?”
Maraga also raised concerns about possible corruption, asking whether this was another scheme for personal gain. “What evidence do we have that this is not an offshore scam? Have the funds been transferred to the Consolidated Fund as required by law?” he added.
The former Chief Justice linked such financial mismanagement to Kenya’s economic struggles, emphasizing that ordinary citizens suffer the consequences of unchecked graft. He called on Kenyans to hold leaders accountable and elect those committed to the rule of law.
This latest scandal adds to growing public frustration over alleged corruption and lack of transparency in government dealings. With no clear explanation from authorities, pressure is mounting for a thorough investigation into the eTA funds and the involvement of the Swiss firm.
As Kenyans grapple with rising living costs, Maraga’s remarks highlight the urgent need for accountability in public finance management. The government must address these concerns to restore trust and ensure compliance with constitutional provisions on revenue collection and expenditure.
Conclusion: The eTA controversy underscores deeper systemic issues in Kenya’s governance. Without swift action, such scandals risk further eroding public confidence in institutions meant to safeguard national resources.
