Kenya’s President William Ruto has ignited a political storm after pledging substantial donations to churches, despite a previous ban on government officials participating in church fundraisers. His recent contributions of $150,000 (20 million shillings) to the Jesus Winner Ministry Church in Nairobi have led to protests, with critics accusing the president of breaching his own anti-corruption stance. A week after the donation, protesters gathered outside the church, demanding the return of what they described as “stolen tax money.” Police responded by teargassing the demonstrators.
Church donations have long been a feature of Kenyan political life, often used by politicians to win favor with voters in the predominantly Christian nation. However, the practice has become increasingly controversial, particularly after mass protests erupted last year against tax hikes, corruption, and police brutality. In response, Ruto had vowed to ban public servants from participating in fundraising events, citing the risk of corruption. Yet, his actions appear to contradict this commitment.
The president has dismissed critics of his donations, labeling them as people who “don’t believe in God.” He maintains that the funds come from his personal wealth, but skepticism remains. Critics, including Mwabili Mwagodi of the “Occupy Church” movement, question the source of the money, calling for transparency and accountability. The movement seeks to protect the church from political exploitation and corruption.
Some church leaders defend Ruto’s donations, calling them a “Godly idea,” while others worry that these contributions are part of a broader strategy to gain political influence. Legal experts have raised concerns that the funds could be used for money laundering or to win votes, further eroding public trust.
In a country where the church plays a significant role in public life, the ongoing debate highlights the intersection of religion and politics and raises questions about transparency and accountability in public funding.
