Narc Kenya leader Martha Karua has firmly stated her refusal to ever work for President William Ruto. In a recent interview on Citizen TV, Karua was unequivocal in her response to whether she would have accepted a nomination from Ruto’s administration. “Of course, I wouldn’t work for William Ruto. Whatever changes and whatever quality of people he gets, he is the minister for everything. He will not let anybody work,” she declared.
Karua, who has had a storied career in Kenyan politics, emphasized that she had not received any job offer from Ruto’s government, but even if she had, her answer would have been a resolute no. Drawing from her experience working with both President Ruto and opposition leader Raila Odinga in Parliament, Karua highlighted the stark differences between the two. She praised Raila for his collaborative approach, noting that “even when you have differences, there is always room to sit down and address whatever it is.”
In stark contrast, Karua criticized President Ruto’s leadership style, asserting that he would not allow others to function independently within his government. Her critique extends beyond just personal preferences, reflecting a broader discontent with the current administration. She labeled Ruto’s recent Cabinet nominations as a mere “diversionary tactic,” suggesting that the changes were superficial and failed to address the core issues facing Kenyans.
“The Cabinet nominations are a diversionary tactic. Ruto got the message that the people want him to go, a fresh start. He then goes ahead to nominate Cabinet and the vetting becomes a circus in parliament,” Karua said during the interview. She argued that the new Cabinet, despite its fresh faces, represents more of the same ineffective governance. According to Karua, the process of vetting Cabinet Secretary nominees was nothing short of a “circus,” further illustrating her belief that the Ruto administration is out of touch with the needs and demands of the Kenyan people.
Karua’s unwavering stance against joining the Kenya Kwanza government reflects a deep-seated conviction about the direction in which the country is heading. She has been vocal about the administration’s failure to listen to the public, particularly the younger generation, or Generation Z, who have been at the forefront of demanding change. “The message is that this is more of the same, nothing has changed, nothing will change and the regime is tone deaf to the demands of Kenyans as fronted by the Gen Zs,” she asserted.
Her remarks resonate with a segment of the population that feels increasingly disillusioned with the current government. By aligning herself with these sentiments, Karua continues to position herself as a significant figure in the opposition, championing the causes of those who believe in a different vision for Kenya.
Karua’s comments also underline the challenges facing President Ruto’s administration in gaining broad-based support and trust. As a seasoned politician who has held various high-profile positions, including Justice Minister, her insights carry weight. Her refusal to consider a role in Ruto’s Cabinet is not just a personal decision but a symbolic gesture that underscores the broader political rifts and discontent in the country.
In conclusion, Martha Karua’s firm rejection of any potential role in President William Ruto’s government highlights the deep divisions and dissatisfaction within Kenyan politics. Her experience and outspoken nature ensure that her voice remains a powerful one in the ongoing discourse about the country’s future.
