Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza was officially removed from office late Tuesday night after the Senate upheld her impeachment by the Meru County Assembly, marking a significant chapter in Kenya’s political landscape. This decision followed a lengthy and dramatic session in the Senate, culminating in a vote that sealed the fate of the embattled governor. Mwangaza, who has served as the governor of Meru for just under two years, faced a series of charges that ultimately led to her ousting.
The Impeachment Charges
Mwangaza was charged with three key allegations: gross violation of the Constitution, abuse of office, and gross misconduct. These charges were brought against her by the Meru County Assembly, which had initiated the impeachment process. The County Assembly’s accusations centered around Mwangaza’s alleged breaches of ethical conduct and governance principles, which they argued were severe enough to warrant her removal from office.
The Senate, tasked with determining the validity of these charges, engaged in a rigorous examination of the evidence presented. Despite Mwangaza’s defense and her plea of not guilty, the Senate found her culpable on all three charges.
The Senate Vote
The Senate vote was a critical moment in the impeachment process, with each Senator’s decision contributing to the final
outcome. The results of the vote reflected a strong consensus among the Senators that Mwangaza’s actions had indeed breached the standards expected of her office.
- First Charge: Gross Violation of the Constitution
On this charge, 26 Senators voted in favor of the impeachment, while only 4 opposed it. The substantial support for this charge indicated that the majority of Senators were convinced that Mwangaza’s actions were in clear violation of the constitutional duties and responsibilities expected of her as governor. - Second Charge: Gross Misconduct
The second charge saw a similar outcome, with 26 Senators voting YES and 2 voting NO. The charge of gross misconduct involved allegations that Mwangaza had engaged in behavior unbefitting her role, further undermining her ability to govern effectively. - Third Charge: Abuse of Office
The most decisive vote was on the third charge of abuse of office, where 27 Senators voted in favor of impeachment. This charge was particularly significant as it directly related to Mwangaza’s alleged misuse of her authority for personal gain or to the detriment of public service. Only one Senator voted in her favor, and 14 were marked absent across all charges.
The Final Decision
Following the vote, Senate Speaker Amason Kingi announced the results and confirmed the decision to impeach Mwangaza. “Pursuant to Article 181 of the Constitution, Section 33 of the County Governments Act, and Standing Order 86 of the Senate’s Standing Orders, The Senate has resolved to remove from office by impeachment, Hon Kawira Mwangaza, the governor of Meru County and the Governor Accordingly ceases to hold office,” declared Speaker Kingi, marking the end of Mwangaza’s tenure as governor.
Mwangaza’s Response and the Political Aftermath
Governor Kawira Mwangaza, who was present throughout the Senate session, maintained her innocence and contested all charges brought against her by the Meru County Assembly. In her defense, Mwangaza argued that the charges were politically motivated and lacked substantive evidence. However, her pleas fell on deaf ears as the Senators voted overwhelmingly in favor of her impeachment.
The decision to impeach Mwangaza has far-reaching implications for Meru County’s political landscape. The removal of a sitting governor is a rare event in Kenyan politics and reflects the gravity of the charges and the weight of the evidence presented against her.
A Troubled Tenure
Mwangaza’s impeachment marks the culmination of a tumultuous period in her political career. The latest impeachment motion was the fifth attempt by the Meru County Assembly to remove her from office in just under two years. This relentless pursuit by the Assembly suggests deep-rooted conflicts and dissatisfaction with her leadership among local lawmakers.
As Meru County prepares to transition to new leadership, the focus will likely shift to the appointment of an acting governor and the subsequent by-election. The citizens of Meru will be watching closely to see who will step up to lead the county out of this period of uncertainty.
Conclusion
The impeachment of Governor Kawira Mwangaza serves as a stark reminder of the accountability mechanisms in place within Kenya’s political system. Despite her efforts to contest the charges, the Senate’s decision reflects a commitment to upholding the principles of good governance and the rule of law. As Meru County moves forward, the lessons from Mwangaza’s tenure will undoubtedly influence the future of its leadership and governance.
