Fast-rising political activist Morara Kebaso, known for his incisive mimicry of President William Ruto’s speeches and political style, has stirred mixed reactions with his recent appeal for financial assistance. Kebaso aims to enhance his public outreach by investing in a Ksh.1.2 million public address system, a move he believes will bolster his civic education efforts and amplify his message to the masses.
In a post on his popular X (formerly Twitter) account, Kebaso outlined his plan to acquire a high-quality sound system, which he intends to install in a vehicle for “campaign-style” public engagements. He disclosed that he has already raised Ksh. 325,000 but needs additional support to reach the target amount. Kebaso highlighted the costs involved, including a generator, front LED lights, mixers, equalizers, signal links, and speakers, and even suggested an alternative plan involving a less expensive sound system.
Despite the clarity of his proposal, Kebaso’s fundraising campaign has been met with skepticism and criticism. Some Kenyans have expressed doubts about his intentions, questioning whether this initiative is a genuine effort to enhance his activism or merely a way to capitalize on his popularity for personal gain. Critics argue that asking for public funds might be a red flag, suggesting that Kebaso could be using his newfound fame to secure financial benefits under the guise of activism.
One user on X criticized Kebaso, stating, “Wow! You started without public participation, you can continue without public participation. Don’t take advantage of goodwill from citizens that makes you no different from the politicians. Welcome to politics!” This sentiment reflects concerns that Kebaso might be veering into the realm of opportunism rather than maintaining his initial activist purity.
On the other hand, supporters of Kebaso defend his approach, arguing that activism requires financial resources to be effective. They emphasize that fundraising is a common practice among activists and politicians alike, and without such support, the effectiveness of public campaigns can be severely limited. A supporter pointed out, “You have been pressuring this man to tour the country and bring you reports of government mismanagement. How do you imagine he moves around? Who fuels his car? Touring needs money!”
Kebaso has responded to critics by asserting that his request for funds is transparent and aimed at achieving tangible results. He has promised that contributors will witness the outcomes of their support and has defended his decision to withhold some financial details due to security concerns. “I am not afraid to ask for financial support because my conscience is clear on how it will be used,” he wrote. He also encouraged Kenyans to trust him despite the limited disclosure of financial specifics, framing the situation as a matter of personal integrity and transparency.
The debate surrounding Kebaso’s fundraising efforts highlights a broader discussion about the role of financial support in activism. Historically, activists have faced scrutiny when seeking funds, with critics often questioning their motives and transparency. This is reminiscent of past controversies involving prominent activists like Boniface Mwangi, who faced similar skepticism during his campaigns.
In contrast, supporters argue that financial contributions are essential for activists to sustain their efforts and make meaningful impacts. They draw parallels to international fundraising practices, such as those seen in high-profile political campaigns in the United States, where small donations from a large number of supporters can drive significant change.
Ultimately, Kebaso’s fundraising campaign reflects a complex intersection of activism, public perception, and financial necessity. As the debate continues, it underscores the challenges faced by those who seek to blend activism with practical realities, striving to balance public trust with the need for resources to drive their missions forward.
