Moses Wetang’ula Lauds MPs’ Decision to Impeach Rigathi Gachagua, Backs Court Ruling on Transition to Kindiki

National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula has made his first public statement regarding the recent impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. Wetang’ula, who presided over the impeachment proceedings, commended the Members of Parliament (MPs) for their decisive action in removing Gachagua, hailing them as courageous and asserting that this decision will ultimately contribute to political stability in Kenya. The Speaker expressed confidence that the courts would uphold the resolution, paving the way for Kithure Kindiki to assume the role of Deputy President.

Impeachment Proceedings and the Role of Speaker Wetang’ula

The impeachment motion was introduced by Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse, citing divisive politics and other allegations against Gachagua. Wetang’ula’s role in overseeing the proceedings underscored the weight of this decision within Kenya’s legislative framework. As MPs debated the charges, Wetang’ula remained impartial, ensuring that the proceedings followed constitutional and procedural mandates.

After MPs voted in favor of the impeachment, Wetang’ula lauded them for demonstrating what he described as “political courage and loyalty to the country’s unity.” He emphasized that the National Assembly had acted out of loyalty to Kenya and to the foundational principles of its democracy.

Wetang’ula’s remarks were not merely congratulatory; they reflected a broader philosophical stance on politics in Kenya. “The only currency in politics is loyalty. Loyalty to your cause, the people who elected you, your boss, and what you stand for,” he stated. Wetang’ula’s message conveyed the conviction that loyalty and integrity must guide political decisions and transcend partisan allegiances, especially when national unity is at stake.

The Path Forward for Kithure Kindiki

Wetang’ula expressed his confidence that Professor Kithure Kindiki, the preferred successor to Gachagua, is well-prepared to assume the role of Deputy President. Kindiki, who has a strong track record in public service and academia, is widely respected in the political arena. Wetang’ula highlighted that Kindiki understands the importance of loyalty and unity in leadership, qualities he believes will serve the country well if the courts uphold the decision.

For Wetang’ula, Kindiki’s ascent is not just about filling a vacancy but about re-aligning the office of the Deputy President with the vision of national stability. “I know Professor Kindiki understands this well,” Wetang’ula affirmed, implying that Kindiki’s reputation for integrity and level-headed leadership will be beneficial during this transitional period. The Speaker’s endorsement of Kindiki marks an important moment, particularly as Kindiki’s support within the National Assembly remains strong.

Legal Challenges and National Assembly’s Preparedness

Despite the confidence exuded by Wetang’ula and the MPs, the road to a smooth transition is currently blocked by legal challenges. Following his impeachment, Gachagua moved to court to contest the decision, arguing that he was not given a fair hearing. Gachagua claimed he had fallen ill during a key moment of the hearings, which prevented him from defending himself. He obtained conservatory orders from the court, temporarily halting Kindiki’s swearing-in until the matter could be fully adjudicated.

Wetang’ula, however, stated that the National Assembly is prepared to defend its decision rigorously. The Speaker assured the public that the Assembly has retained a team of top-tier legal experts who will argue that Gachagua’s impeachment was both constitutional and fair. “We have lined up various lawyers to defend the National Assembly’s decision and position in the ongoing legal battle,” he affirmed.

Wetang’ula’s remarks underscore the National Assembly’s resolve to see the process through, regardless of the legal obstacles posed by Gachagua’s appeal. This determination reflects the Assembly’s belief that Gachagua’s conduct in office posed a serious enough threat to warrant removal and replacement with Kindiki.

Wetang’ula Criticizes Gachagua’s “Mountain Politics”

In his speech, Wetang’ula also took the opportunity to criticize Gachagua’s style of leadership, which he described as “obsessive mountain politics.” Wetang’ula suggested that Gachagua’s focus on the “politics of the mountain”a reference to Kenya’s Mt. Kenya region and its historical political significance—had been divisive and detrimental to national unity. This focus, according to Wetang’ula, had become a “dangerous trend,” creating rifts within Kenya’s diverse communities.

The Speaker emphasized that, unlike Gachagua, he himself comes from Mt. Elgon, another mountainous region in Kenya, but does not incessantly reference it in political discourse. By drawing this distinction, Wetang’ula underscored his belief that politicians should prioritize national interests over regional identities. This critique is significant because it highlights a broader concern about regionalism in Kenyan politics and the potential harm it can inflict on national unity.

Gachagua’s political strategy has long relied on emphasizing his ties to the Mt. Kenya region, where he has substantial support. However, Wetang’ula’s comments suggest that this strategy has inadvertently isolated Gachagua from the broader Kenyan populace and has fueled divisions rather than fostering inclusivity.

The Legal Battle Ahead and the Future of Kenya’s Politics

With the matter now in court, the fate of Gachagua and Kindiki rests in the hands of a three-judge bench set to hear consolidated petitions on October 29. Legal experts and political analysts alike are closely watching the proceedings, as the court’s decision could set a new precedent for the impeachment process in Kenya. Should the court rule in favor of the National Assembly, it will validate the MPs’ decision and allow Kindiki to be sworn in as Deputy President. Conversely, a ruling in Gachagua’s favor could undermine the legitimacy of the Assembly’s authority, leading to potential amendments to Kenya’s impeachment protocols.

Wetang’ula’s confidence in the judiciary’s ultimate ruling reflects his faith in Kenya’s legal system and its ability to reinforce the Assembly’s decision. The Speaker has expressed optimism that the conservatory orders preventing Kindiki’s swearing-in will soon be lifted, facilitating a smooth transition of power. “I assure Kenyans that the future is bright,” Wetang’ula said, emphasizing his belief that the Assembly’s action was both necessary and beneficial for Kenya’s future stability.

National and Regional Reactions to the Impeachment

The impeachment of Gachagua has sparked mixed reactions across Kenya. In central Kenya, where Gachagua enjoys a significant following, many of his supporters have rallied against the impeachment, viewing it as an affront to their community’s political influence. Leaders from this region have expressed solidarity with Gachagua, with some vowing to challenge the Assembly’s decision in court.

In other parts of Kenya, however, the response has been markedly different. Many leaders, including some within Gachagua’s own party, have expressed relief at the decision, viewing it as a step toward fostering a more inclusive and less divisive political climate. This divide illustrates the deep regionalism that Wetang’ula alluded to and underscores the challenges that Kenya faces in achieving national unity.

Conclusion: Wetang’ula’s Vision for a Unified Kenya

Moses Wetang’ula’s comments following Gachagua’s impeachment reveal a vision of Kenya that transcends regional loyalties and focuses on national unity. By commending MPs for their decision, Wetang’ula has sent a powerful message about the importance of loyalty to Kenya as a whole rather than to particular ethnic or regional identities. His confidence in Kindiki as a capable and unifying figure highlights his commitment to fostering a political climate where integrity and national cohesion take precedence.

As Kenya awaits the court’s final ruling, Wetang’ula’s stance reminds both politicians and citizens alike of the importance of unity and inclusivity in leadership. Regardless of the court’s decision, the political landscape in Kenya has been irrevocably altered. The impeachment process has served as a wake-up call for leaders across the nation, highlighting the necessity of a shared commitment to stability and the common good. For Wetang’ula, the actions taken by the National Assembly reflect the type of courage and loyalty required to build a brighter future for Kenya.