A growing wave of discontent has surfaced within Kenya’s National Assembly over the Ministry of Education’s proposed role in managing bursary funds for students, particularly those from vulnerable backgrounds. During a session to debate a motion by Nairobi County Woman Representative, Esther Passaris, which calls for comprehensive reforms to the country’s education bursary schemes, several Members of Parliament (MPs) voiced their strong opposition, expressing lack of trust and confidence in the Ministry’s ability to manage the funds effectively.
The motion, which aims to consolidate the various bursary schemes across the country into a unified system, has garnered significant attention, with both support and strong criticism from lawmakers. Passaris proposed merging existing bursary systems including the National Government Constituencies Development Fund (NG-CDF), the National Government Affirmative Action Fund (NGAAF), and various county and ward-based schemes into a single fund that would be managed by the Ministry of Education. The goal of this reform is to streamline bursary allocation, improve transparency, and ensure equitable access to education for all Kenyan children.
However, this proposal has sparked heated debates. MPs, especially those from vulnerable constituencies, have expressed skepticism regarding the Ministry of Education’s ability to effectively oversee such a significant responsibility. The key concern is centered around transparency, accountability, and the potential for corruption.
Kilifi North MP Owen Baya was among the most vocal critics of the proposal, highlighting the challenges of trusting the Ministry with the management of bursary funds. “We have no trust and confidence that the Ministry of Education will handle the bursaries. If we make the mistake of taking this money to the Ministry of Education, we all know where this money will go,” Baya remarked. “We are the representatives of the people, we know the needy families,” he added, emphasizing that local MPs and representatives are better suited to identify and serve the educational needs of vulnerable children in their respective constituencies.
Baya’s sentiments were echoed by other MPs, who pointed to the current inefficiencies in the management of other education-related funds, including the contentious issue of capitation in public schools. “Indeed, we need to have a way of having free education in this country, but let us do it in the right way. You remember, to date, we are still fighting the Ministry of Education with capitation,” said Beatrice Elechi, the MP for Dagoretti North. Elechi highlighted the ongoing struggle with the allocation of capitation funds to schools, which remains a contentious issue despite previous reforms.
The MPs argued that the Ministry of Education’s centralization of bursary management could worsen existing issues, citing previous examples where local resources have been mismanaged. “The challenge we face is not about how the bursary is being given, but it is the people who have stayed in Jogoo House (the Ministry of Education Headquarters) for a while now, and they are the biggest problem we are facing,” Elechi continued, pointing to entrenched bureaucratic inefficiencies that continue to plague the ministry.
There were also concerns about the fairness of a centralized system. MPs questioned whether the Ministry would be able to effectively prioritize the needs of the most vulnerable children in the face of political interference and competing interests from different regions. “While we want free education for every child, we also have to be careful that the allocation process does not become politicized or skewed towards certain areas,” said one MP, requesting anonymity.
Despite these objections, Passaris defended the motion, arguing that the consolidation of bursary funds would help streamline the process and eliminate duplication. By sending the funds directly to schools, she believes that this system would ensure more children benefit from free basic education. She further emphasized that the aim was to create a more efficient, transparent, and unified system that could better respond to the educational needs of students across Kenya.
The idea of consolidating bursary schemes into a single fund has been lauded by education reform advocates, who argue that it could reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies and ensure that financial aid is directed toward the children who need it most. However, the MPs’ concerns raise significant questions about the feasibility and integrity of such a move, particularly when the Ministry of Education has historically struggled with managing funds effectively.
This debate is not just about the allocation of bursaries; it reflects broader frustrations with the management of Kenya’s education system. Despite significant progress in expanding access to education, many feel that the current system remains flawed and that a major overhaul is needed to ensure that funds are used efficiently and equitably.
As the motion continues to garner attention, it is clear that the road to education reform in Kenya will require careful negotiation, transparency, and a commitment to addressing the concerns of MPs who represent some of the country’s most vulnerable populations. Whether the proposed reforms will pass remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: there is a deep divide between those advocating for change and those wary of the Ministry’s ability to handle such a significant responsibility.
