Nakuru County is in turmoil as residents express vehement opposition to a draft valuation law proposing a dramatic increase in land rates. Scheduled to take effect in January 2025, the new law has ignited widespread anger among locals, who argue that the timing and scale of the proposed hikes are both unjust and unfeasible.
The contentious draft law, unveiled in local dailies, outlines a new land valuation roll that indicates a staggering increase of over 200% in land rates. This hefty rise has sparked significant outrage, especially among former leaders of the region who question both the timing and the rationale behind the proposed hikes.
Former Bahati MP Kimani Ngunjiri was among the first to voice his concerns. Ngunjiri criticized the proposed increase, arguing that the residents are already grappling with tough economic conditions and are ill-equipped to handle an additional financial burden. He emphasized that the steep 2% valuation on properties, as stipulated in the new law, is particularly burdensome for many locals. His criticism was underscored by his belief that the county has not demonstrated sufficient development to justify such a significant increase in land rates.
In support of Ngunjiri’s stance, former Ndundori MCA Steve Kihara has also voiced strong objections. Kihara has urged current ward representatives to prioritize the issue in the county assembly, framing it as a matter of public importance. He has called for a comprehensive review of the valuation, advocating for consultations with local communities to ensure that their voices are heard and considered in the decision-making process.
The crux of the residents’ argument revolves around the perceived lack of tangible development in Nakuru. Many argue that the county has not seen substantial improvements in infrastructure or public services that would warrant such a steep hike in land rates. This sentiment reflects a broader frustration among residents who feel that they are being unfairly targeted with increased financial demands without corresponding benefits.
Public participation has become a central rallying point for those opposed to the new rates. Residents are pushing for a more inclusive approach to the implementation of the new land valuation roll, advocating for forums where they can express their concerns and contribute to a more balanced and equitable solution. They argue that without adequate public engagement, the decision to implement the new rates lacks legitimacy and does not reflect the needs and capacities of the local population.
The Nakuru County government’s response to the backlash remains to be seen. As of now, there has been no official statement addressing the residents’ concerns or indicating any potential revisions to the draft law. However, the mounting pressure from local leaders and the general public suggests that the county government may need to reassess its approach to avoid further unrest.
The situation in Nakuru serves as a stark reminder of the complex interplay between economic policy and public sentiment. As the January 2025 deadline approaches, the county faces a critical challenge: balancing its revenue needs with the financial realities of its residents. Whether a compromise can be reached or whether the draft valuation law will be enacted as is remains to be seen. For now, Nakuru’s residents are steadfast in their call for fairness and transparency, determined to ensure that any changes to land rates are both justifiable and sustainable.
