Nairobi Woman Representative Esther Passaris has stepped up in defense of the controversial government decision to lease the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) to the Indian multinational conglomerate, Adani Group. Speaking at JKIA, Passaris emphasized the need for Kenyans to understand the scope and potential benefits of the proposed takeover, despite growing concerns and public dissent.
The proposed deal has sparked significant controversy, with the ongoing strike by airport workers underscoring the depth of opposition to the Adani takeover. The strike has left hundreds of passengers stranded at Kenya’s main international gateway, further fueling discontent. Amid this turmoil, Passaris has sought to shift the narrative by highlighting the positive track record of the Adani Group in airport management.
“I have been to Ahmedabad Airport in India several times, and I can attest to the transformation it has undergone under the stewardship of the Adani Group,” Passaris remarked. “The first time I visited the airport four years ago, it was far from impressive. Today, it stands as a five-star facility, a testament to the Group’s commitment to excellence.”
The lease agreement, which would grant Adani control over JKIA for the next 30 years, includes a substantial investment pledge of Sh238 billion. This investment is aimed at upgrading and expanding the airport to elevate its status to one comparable with leading global airports like Dubai’s.
Passaris, who was at the airport hoping to catch a flight to Johannesburg for the Pan-African Parliament meeting, expressed optimism that the strike would be resolved soon. “It is crucial for the public to understand the details of this deal,” she said. “The Government Spokesman has been tasked with breaking down the specifics of what Adani plans to do with the airport. This includes how much will be invested in refurbishing the facilities and upgrading the terminals.”
The deal’s approval in June, following the submission of Adani Enterprises Limited’s proposal on March 1, 2024, has faced legal and public challenges. The High Court recently issued a stay order, prohibiting any action on the Adani proposal until the case concludes. The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) and Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) have moved to court, questioning the transparency and potential impacts of the takeover.
Public outrage has been fueled by concerns over the secrecy surrounding the deal and its long-term implications for the airport’s management and operations. Critics argue that the lease agreement, which involves a significant foreign investment, may not adequately address national interests or involve sufficient public scrutiny.
In response to these concerns, Passaris has urged the public to consider the broader benefits that could arise from the partnership with Adani. “The transformation of Ahmedabad Airport is just one example of what can be achieved with the right investment and management. If Adani can bring similar improvements to JKIA, it could position Kenya as a key player in regional and global aviation.”
The Adani Group’s reputation in managing and upgrading infrastructure projects is being closely examined, with many stakeholders keen to see if their track record can translate into tangible benefits for Kenya. The proposed upgrades at JKIA are expected to enhance passenger experience, expand capacity, and potentially boost Kenya’s standing as a major transit hub.
As the situation continues to evolve, the focus remains on the legal proceedings and the ongoing negotiations between the government and various stakeholders. The resolution of the strike and the clarity provided by the Government Spokesman will be pivotal in shaping public perception and determining the future of JKIA under the Adani Group’s management.
The debate surrounding the JKIA takeover highlights broader concerns about foreign investments in critical national infrastructure and the need for transparent processes and public engagement. While Passaris and the government emphasize the potential benefits of the deal, the opposition’s legal challenges reflect a broader demand for accountability and thorough scrutiny in such high-stakes agreements.
In conclusion, the proposed takeover of JKIA by the Adani Group remains a contentious issue, marked by legal battles, public protests, and fervent debates. As Kenya navigates these challenges, the resolution of the strike and the unfolding legal outcomes will play a crucial role in determining the future trajectory of this significant infrastructure deal.
