Political Power Plays in Kenya: Eugene Wamalwa’s Warning to MP Didmus Barasa on DP Gachagua’s Impeachment

The political landscape in Kenya has always been characterized by complex alliances, power struggles, and shifting loyalties. Recent developments have put the country’s political dynamics into sharp focus, as allegations of impeachment against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua have surfaced. Kimilili MP Didmus Barasa, a staunch ally of President William Ruto, announced his intention to sponsor a motion of impeachment against the Deputy President, sparking reactions from across the political spectrum. One of the more prominent voices against this move has been Democratic Action Party of Kenya (DAP-K) leader Eugene Wamalwa, who cautioned Barasa against being “used” in what he views as a politically motivated ploy.

At a burial ceremony in Kimilili, Wamalwa delivered a strong message to Barasa, advising him to focus on serving his constituents rather than getting entangled in political battles that don’t benefit the people of Western Kenya. His speech has become emblematic of the broader political discourse about the role of elected officials, the priorities of the Kenya Kwanza regime, and the future of the Deputy President.

This article delves into the complexities surrounding the impeachment motion, Wamalwa’s warning, and what it means for Kenya’s political future.

The Emergence of the Impeachment Motion

The announcement by Kimilili MP Didmus Barasa to sponsor a motion aimed at impeaching Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua was met with both support and skepticism. According to Barasa, he had gathered 242 signatures from fellow lawmakers, signaling significant backing for his motion. However, the impetus behind the impeachment remains unclear, with speculation circulating about internal rifts within the Kenya Kwanza coalition.

Barasa, known for his unwavering loyalty to President Ruto, framed the impeachment as a necessary action to preserve the administration’s integrity. However, many political commentators have raised concerns that this could be a veiled attempt to weaken Gachagua, whose influence within the Mount Kenya region has been steadily growing.

On the surface, the impeachment motion appears to be an isolated move by a single MP. However, it is unlikely that such a decision would be made without the blessing of powerful figures within the Kenya Kwanza alliance. The motion could represent a calculated effort to undermine Gachagua’s position or even pave the way for a more amenable deputy who aligns more closely with Ruto’s long-term agenda.

Eugene Wamalwa’s Response: A Call for Focus

Eugene Wamalwa’s response to Barasa’s announcement was swift and direct. Speaking during a burial ceremony in Kimilili Constituency, Wamalwa urged Barasa to reconsider his involvement in the impeachment motion. His message resonated with many, particularly those in Western Kenya, who are grappling with pressing socio-economic issues such as the struggling sugar industry.

Wamalwa questioned the logic behind Barasa’s move, asking whether impeaching Gachagua would bring tangible benefits to the people of Kimilili or Western Kenya as a whole. He pointed out that the people of Kimilili had not elected Barasa to engage in political machinations, but rather to address the development needs of his constituency.

“Tunaskia mtoto wetu Didmus ndiye atatumika labda kuwa kile kisu kitamchinja Bwana Gachagua. Watu wa Kimilili, hayo ndiyo tulituma mbunge wetu kufanya? Nikimpata, I’ll advice him not to be misused,” Wamalwa stated, implying that Barasa may be acting on behalf of political forces outside his constituency.

By focusing on local issues like the revival of the sugar industry, Wamalwa painted Barasa’s involvement in the impeachment saga as a distraction from the real work that needs to be done in Western Kenya. His argument touched on several key concerns for the region, including the rising cost of food and fertilizer, school fees, and the need for new machinery for farmers in Nzoia.

Mount Kenya Influence and National Unity

One of the underlying themes of Wamalwa’s critique is the growing influence of Mount Kenya politicians in national politics. Since President Ruto’s rise to power, the role of the Mount Kenya region, represented by figures like Rigathi Gachagua, has become more pronounced. While Gachagua’s supporters see him as a vital representative of the region’s interests, his detractors view him as a divisive figure who has concentrated too much power in the hands of a small group of elites.

Wamalwa’s warning to Barasa highlights the delicate balance of power within Kenya’s political landscape. By framing the impeachment as a tool being wielded by Mount Kenya politicians to undermine Gachagua, Wamalwa is tapping into regional sentiments that often feel marginalized by the central government.

The message to Barasa is clear: do not be swayed by external forces that do not have the best interests of the people of Kimilili at heart. Wamalwa’s emphasis on regional development and unity contrasts with the factionalism that often characterizes Kenyan politics, where regional and ethnic allegiances play a significant role in shaping political outcomes.

Kenya Kwanza’s Unfulfilled Promises

Beyond the immediate issue of Gachagua’s impeachment, Wamalwa’s speech touched on a broader dissatisfaction with the Kenya Kwanza administration. He criticized the government for failing to deliver on its election promises, particularly to the people of Western Kenya.

During his campaign, President Ruto pledged to prioritize the needs of farmers and revitalize industries like sugar, which has been the backbone of Western Kenya’s economy for decades. However, according to Wamalwa, little progress has been made on these fronts. Instead, political maneuvering and infighting have taken center stage, with the impeachment of the Deputy President becoming a focal point of controversy.

“Leo nataka niambie President Ruto, wewe ulitoa ahadi kupigania wakulima wa miwa Western sio mambo yakuimpeach Gachagua,” Wamalwa stated, reflecting the growing frustration among voters who feel that their needs are being sidelined in favor of political drama.

Wamalwa’s comments highlight a broader concern that the Kenya Kwanza administration is losing sight of its core mission to improve the lives of ordinary Kenyans. The risk, he suggests, is that the administration will become bogged down in internal power struggles, leaving key issues like agriculture, education, and healthcare unresolved.

Political Fallout and Future Implications

As the debate over Gachagua’s impeachment unfolds, it is likely to have far-reaching implications for Kenya’s political future. While it is too early to predict whether Barasa’s motion will succeed, the very act of proposing it signals potential cracks within the Kenya Kwanza coalition.

For Deputy President Gachagua, the impeachment motion represents a direct challenge to his authority and influence within the government. If the motion gains traction, it could embolden his opponents and weaken his standing within the administration. On the other hand, if the motion fails, it could serve to solidify Gachagua’s position and silence his critics within the Kenya Kwanza alliance.

For Didmus Barasa, the decision to sponsor the motion could either elevate his status within the ruling coalition or backfire, depending on how the political winds shift. Should the motion succeed, Barasa could be seen as a key player in reshaping the future of Kenya’s leadership. However, if the motion fails, he risks alienating both his constituents and his political allies.

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding the impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has exposed the fault lines within Kenya’s political landscape. Eugene Wamalwa’s warning to MP Didmus Barasa reflects a broader concern that the country’s leaders are becoming too focused on power struggles at the expense of addressing pressing socio-economic issues.

As the impeachment debate unfolds, the key question remains: will Kenya’s leaders prioritize the needs of their constituents, or will they continue to engage in political infighting? Wamalwa’s call for Barasa to focus on development rather than divisive politics resonates with many, particularly in regions like Western Kenya that have long felt neglected by the central government.

In the end, the outcome of the impeachment motion will not only determine Gachagua’s future but could also shape the trajectory of the Kenya Kwanza administration and the country’s political future for years to come.