United Democratic Alliance (UDA) figures have publicly criticized Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, accusing him of fostering ethnic politics. This internal strife follows closely on the heels of rumors suggesting a faction within UDA, loyal to President William Ruto, is plotting to impeach Gachagua. The controversy has now prompted demands from Gachagua’s supporters for the ouster of Kimani Ichung’wah from his role as Majority Leader in the National Assembly.
Nandi Senator Samson Cherarkey, a vocal ally of DP Gachagua, has been at the forefront of this demand. Cherarkey accuses Ichung’wah of undermining the party’s unity and showing disrespect to the Deputy President.
“Kimani Ichung’wah no longer has the locus standi to be the majority leader. He has become a divisive figure in the National Assembly, in Parliament, and in Kenya. I urge members of the National Assembly to take the necessary steps to relieve him of his seat,” declared Cherarkey.
The call for Ichung’wah’s resignation marks a significant moment in the unfolding drama within UDA, highlighting the deepening factionalism within the party. Tensions have been particularly high following a tumultuous session in the National Assembly, during which several lawmakers voiced their criticisms of Gachagua.
In response to the growing dissent, Gachagua has made public statements defending his recent political actions, aiming to clarify his stance and quell the rising tide of opposition. He has sought to reassure his supporters and the broader public that his leadership remains focused on national unity and progress, despite the accusations of divisiveness.
This internal discord poses a substantial challenge to UDA’s cohesion, coming at a critical juncture for the party as it seeks to consolidate its power and implement its agenda. The public spat between high-ranking members underscores the complexities and power struggles inherent in political party dynamics, particularly in a diverse and politically vibrant country like Kenya.
Observers of Kenyan politics will be watching closely to see how this conflict unfolds and what it means for the future of UDA and the broader political landscape. The outcome of this internal strife could have significant implications for the party’s stability and its ability to govern effectively in the coming months.
