DP Gachagua Refutes Claims of Ksh.8B Exit Deal Amid Impeachment Motion

Kenya’s political landscape has recently been gripped by a high-stakes standoff, with Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua at the center of an impeachment motion that has sparked widespread speculation and controversy. Accused of seeking a substantial Ksh.8 billion exit package and facing various legal and ethical charges, Gachagua has been drawn into a confrontation that threatens to destabilize the government and reshape the nation’s political future.

In an interview with local radio stations from the Mt Kenya East region on Sunday, Gachagua emphatically denied allegations of wrongdoing, claiming that he is not driven by personal financial gain. His primary focus, according to him, is serving the people of Kenya. As the impeachment motion heads for parliamentary debate, the Deputy President’s fate now hangs in the balance.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the impeachment motion against DP Gachagua, the political implications it carries, and the potential consequences for the future of Kenya’s governance.

Backdrop of the Allegations

The impeachment motion against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua comes in the wake of accusations that he demanded a hefty Ksh.8 billion compensation to vacate his position. According to the allegations, Gachagua, who hails from the vote-rich Mount Kenya region, sought this package in exchange for the support he reportedly secured for President William Ruto during the 2022 presidential election. Reports suggest that he allegedly banged the table during a meeting with President Ruto after his demand was turned down.

However, in his response, Gachagua dismissed the accusations as “baseless,” stating that he is not interested in money or any financial benefits. Instead, he claims that his priority is to serve the Kenyan people. “I have no interest in any benefits or any money,” Gachagua asserted during the radio interview. He went on to say that he had ample opportunities to be “bought out” by political opponents but rejected them due to his loyalty to President Ruto and his commitment to national service.

In his defense, Gachagua highlighted his family’s modest lifestyle and his belief in putting the needs of Kenyans first. “I don’t have many needs; my children are grown up, and my wife is a pastor,” he said. “I do not put money first; Kenyans are my priority.” Despite his dismissal of the allegations, the accusations have nonetheless fueled a firestorm of political intrigue, with opposition figures seizing the moment to call for his removal.

The Impeachment Motion: Charges and Allegations

The impeachment motion against Gachagua is rooted in several accusations of misconduct and violations of Kenya’s constitution and laws. Spearheaded by Kikuyu MP Kimani Ichung’wah, the motion cites violations of numerous constitutional articles, ranging from the National Values and Principles of Governance to laws pertaining to corruption, money laundering, and national cohesion.

Among the specific charges against the Deputy President are:

1. Violation of Article 10 (National Values and Principles of Governance): Gachagua is accused of making inciteful, reckless, and inflammatory public utterances. His critics argue that these statements are capable of fostering ethnic hatred and balkanizing the nation.
2. Violation of Articles 147, 148, 174, 186, and 189: These articles pertain to his conduct and responsibilities as the principal assistant to the President. Critics claim that he has failed in his role, and his public behavior has undermined his position.
3. Corruption and Unlawful Asset Acquisition: Gachagua has also been accused of corruptly acquiring assets using taxpayer money. This includes allegations that he has misused public funds for personal gain, violating laws such as the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act.
4. Violation of National and International Law: Further charges involve the undermining of the National Cohesion and Integration Act, as well as violations of both the Penal Code and the Leadership and Integrity Act.
5. Mismanagement of National Affairs: Gachagua’s critics argue that his actions have weakened the government from within, contributing to disunity and political instability. This charge is compounded by allegations that he has failed to represent the interests of the Kenyan people in a manner befitting his office.

Political Dynamics and the Road Ahead

The motion to impeach DP Gachagua requires the support of at least 233 members of the National Assembly in order to pass. According to reports, 302 members of parliament had already appended their signatures by the close of business on Sunday, signaling strong momentum behind the push for Gachagua’s removal. If the motion is successful, the matter will be forwarded to Senate Speaker Amason Kingi within two days, as stipulated by the constitution.

Upon receiving the motion, the Senate will convene to deliberate on the charges within seven days. For the impeachment to be confirmed, 45 out of the 67 senators must endorse the grounds for removal. Should this threshold be met, Rigathi Gachagua would cease to hold office as Kenya’s Deputy President, potentially triggering a significant political realignment within President Ruto’s government.

The timing of this motion is particularly critical, as it comes at a juncture when President Ruto’s administration is grappling with various governance challenges, including rising public dissatisfaction over economic issues and internal disagreements within the ruling coalition. Some analysts believe that Gachagua’s removal could either stabilize the administration by eliminating a divisive figure or, conversely, further destabilize the government if it exacerbates internal tensions.

Gachagua’s Defense and Response

Throughout the unfolding controversy, DP Gachagua has maintained a strong stance in his defense. During the Sunday radio interview, he dismissed the allegations as a political smear campaign orchestrated by his rivals. He denied the claim that he banged the table during a meeting with President Ruto over the alleged Ksh.8 billion exit package, insisting that such reports were manufactured to tarnish his reputation.

Gachagua has framed his predicament as a struggle between his dedication to serving the people and the corrupt interests of those seeking to oust him from power. “I have had opportunities to be bought out by political opponents, but I chose not to because my commitment is to the people of Kenya,” he said. Gachagua’s remarks suggest that he views the impeachment motion as an attack on his integrity and a direct challenge to the loyalty he has shown toward President Ruto.

He also hinted at potential political motivations behind the accusations, referencing his role in securing Mount Kenya votes for President Ruto’s 2022 electoral victory. By invoking his contributions to the election, Gachagua appears to be appealing to his regional base in an attempt to shore up support as the impeachment motion looms.

Wider Implications for Kenyan Politics

The impeachment proceedings against DP Gachagua raise important questions about the future of governance in Kenya and the broader political dynamics at play. Gachagua’s potential removal would mark the first time a Kenyan deputy president has been impeached, setting a precedent that could have lasting implications for the structure and functioning of the executive branch.

For President William Ruto, the challenge lies in navigating the political fallout from this unfolding crisis. Ruto’s administration has faced increasing scrutiny in recent months, with critics accusing it of being slow to address key national issues such as inflation, unemployment, and corruption. If Gachagua is impeached, it could embolden opposition forces while weakening the president’s grip on power.

Moreover, the allegations of ethnic balkanization and incitement raise concerns about Kenya’s fragile political cohesion. The Mount Kenya region, which has traditionally been a political powerhouse, could become even more of a battleground if Gachagua’s base feels disenfranchised by his removal. This could deepen divisions within the ruling party and exacerbate existing regional tensions.

Conclusion

As Kenya’s political landscape undergoes yet another test of stability, the impeachment motion against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua highlights the intricate balance of power and loyalty within the country’s leadership. With the motion set to be tabled in the National Assembly on Tuesday, all eyes will be on Parliament and the Senate as they deliberate on the future of Gachagua’s political career.

Whether the motion succeeds or not, the events surrounding this controversy will undoubtedly shape the next chapter of Kenyan politics, with profound implications for the country’s governance, cohesion, and democratic future. As Gachagua faces his political reckoning, the fate of the Deputy President—and possibly the entire administration—hangs in the balance.