Busia Senator Okiya Omtatah has filed a lawsuit challenging the recently assented Budget Appropriation Bill 2024, seeking to prevent Treasury Cabinet Secretary Njuguna Ndung’u from withdrawing Sh1.8 trillion. The legal confrontation comes hot on the heels of President William Ruto’s assent to the Bill last Friday.
The crux of the case revolves around the decision by the two Speakers of Parliament to exclude the input of senators in the legislative process. Omtatah, alongside human rights advocate Eliud Karanja Matindi, moved to court under a certificate of urgency, seeking to suspend the Appropriation Act 2024. Their primary contention is that the exclusion of the Senate’s input undermines the constitutional framework that ensures checks and balances within the legislative process.
In a brief but significant ruling, Justice Lawrence Mugambi of the Milimani Constitutional and Human Rights High Court underscored the need for an expedited hearing of the case. The judge directed National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula and Senate Speaker Amason Kingi to file their responses within three days.
“The lawsuit brought forward by Senator Okiya Omtatah raises fundamental questions about the constitutionality of the legislative process that led to the passing of the Appropriation Act 2024,” Justice Mugambi stated. “Given the urgency and the substantial public interest involved, this matter needs to be heard expeditiously.”
Omtatah and Matindi argue that the legislative process was flawed and that the input of the Senate, as a vital component of Kenya’s bicameral parliament, was unconstitutionally disregarded. They contend that this omission not only violates the principles of democratic governance but also sets a dangerous precedent for future legislative processes.
The Appropriation Act 2024 is a critical piece of legislation that authorizes the government to withdraw funds from the Consolidated Fund to meet its expenditure for the financial year. The Sh1.8 trillion in question represents a substantial portion of the national budget, and the delay or suspension of the Act could have far-reaching implications for government operations and service delivery.
The urgency and gravity of the situation are further compounded by the fact that the new financial year is set to commence imminently. Any disruption in the budgetary allocations could lead to a financial crisis, affecting essential public services and development projects across the country.
The respondents, Speakers Wetang’ula and Kingi, are expected to provide robust defenses to justify their actions and the constitutionality of the legislative process. Their responses will be crucial in shaping the court’s deliberations and the eventual outcome of the case.
As the legal battle unfolds, the nation watches closely. The case not only puts a spotlight on the procedural aspects of lawmaking but also highlights the intricate balance of power between different arms of government. It underscores the ongoing struggle to uphold constitutional principles in the face of political and administrative challenges.
The coming days will be critical as the High Court prepares to hear the substantive arguments from both sides. The outcome will have significant implications not just for the current financial year but for the broader framework of legislative governance in Kenya.
