“Leased Not Bought”: Gachagua Denies TreeTops Hotel Purchase Claims Amid Impeachment Crisis

Kenya’s political landscape has once again been shaken by claims surrounding the country’s Deputy President, Rigathi Gachagua, in the latest controversy involving allegations that his children have purchased the iconic TreeTops Hotel in Aberdare National Park. Speaking to reporters in the Rift Valley region on Monday, Gachagua emphatically denied the accusations, clarifying that his children, Kelvin and Keith, had not bought the hotel but had instead secured a lease from Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS).

“They have leased this hotel from KWS, not purchased it,” Gachagua said, refuting widespread rumors. “People are spreading misinformation without knowledge; this hotel belongs to KWS and has been leased.” The Deputy President stressed that his children do not do business with the government, underlining that they had taken out a loan to lease the hotel. He also highlighted the positive impact his family has made by employing 58 people at the hotel, signaling that the arrangement had broader economic benefits.

The Allegations: Business and Political Implications

The accusations against Gachagua’s family come at a critical juncture for the Deputy President, as he faces mounting political pressure, including an impending impeachment motion scheduled for Tuesday. The allegations that his children bought the TreeTops Hotel have intensified scrutiny, with his political opponents seizing the opportunity to question his integrity. The TreeTops Hotel, famous for being the location where Queen Elizabeth II learned of her ascension to the British throne in 1952, holds historical significance, making any potential acquisition a topic of public interest and controversy.

The broader implications of this case also touch on the perception of public figures in Kenya and their potential involvement in questionable business dealings. For Gachagua, who has consistently denied any wrongdoing, the rumors about his children’s purchase of the hotel come at a time when he is battling serious charges that could end his political career.

Impeachment Motion: A Political Storm Brewing

In addition to the TreeTops Hotel controversy, Gachagua is facing an impeachment motion in the National Assembly, a move that could have profound consequences for Kenya’s political landscape. The motion, which is set to be tabled on Tuesday at 2:30 PM, has already garnered significant attention, with 302 members of Parliament reportedly signing on to support it. To pass, the motion requires the backing of 233 MPs, making it a potentially decisive moment in the Deputy President’s political career.

The charges against Gachagua are wide-ranging and serious, with his accusers pointing to several violations of Kenya’s Constitution. Among these, they claim that Gachagua has violated Article 10, which mandates that public officers conduct themselves in a manner that promotes national unity. His critics accuse him of making inciteful public statements capable of stoking ethnic hatred. Furthermore, Gachagua is accused of violating Articles 147, 148, 174, 186, and 189, which govern his conduct and responsibilities as the President’s principal assistant.

In addition to these charges, Gachagua is also facing accusations of illegally acquiring assets using taxpayer funds. These assets are said to be located in Nyeri, Nairobi, and Kilifi counties, further compounding the challenges he faces as he prepares for what could be a defining moment in his political career.

Rigathi Gachagua’s Defense: Claims of a Political Witch-Hunt

As the impeachment motion looms, Gachagua has maintained his innocence, claiming that the charges against him are politically motivated. He has pointed to the timing of the allegations, suggesting that they are part of a concerted effort to tarnish his reputation and remove him from office.

“These people are desperate to tarnish my name and remove me from office, but they will be shocked when the time comes,” Gachagua declared on Monday. He reiterated his readiness to defend himself against what he described as “trumped-up charges,” emphasizing that his record is clean.

Gachagua’s assertion of a political witch-hunt is not unique in Kenya’s political arena. Several public figures have, in the past, faced similar claims of politically motivated charges, with their supporters arguing that the allegations were engineered by political opponents to weaken their influence or eliminate them as political contenders. In Gachagua’s case, the accusations come at a time when the government is grappling with several key challenges, including economic difficulties and social unrest, raising questions about the true motivations behind the impeachment proceedings.

Legal Battles: Gachagua’s Setback in Court

The Deputy President’s political and legal woes were further compounded on Monday when four attempts to halt the impeachment motion were rejected by the courts. Former Senator Cleophas Malala, acting on Gachagua’s behalf, had filed a petition seeking to prevent Parliament from proceeding with the impeachment motion. However, the High Court dismissed the petition, with Justice Bahati Mwamuye directing the National Assembly to proceed as planned.

In his ruling, Justice Mwamuye instructed the National Assembly to respond by Thursday, October 3, 2024, with Malala having until Friday, October 4, to submit his response. The court’s decision dealt a significant blow to Gachagua’s efforts to stop the impeachment process, setting the stage for what could be a dramatic showdown in Parliament.

With the legal avenues to halt the impeachment motion exhausted, Gachagua is left with limited options. Should the motion pass in the National Assembly, the resolution will be forwarded to Senate Speaker Amason Kingi for further action within two days. This would initiate a trial in the Senate, where Gachagua would be required to defend himself against the charges brought by his accusers.

The Road Ahead: Political Fallout and Consequences

The outcome of the impeachment motion against Rigathi Gachagua is likely to have far-reaching implications for Kenya’s political future. If the motion passes, it would represent a significant blow to the Deputy President and could lead to his removal from office. This would, in turn, create a power vacuum in President William Ruto’s administration, potentially triggering a broader political realignment ahead of the next general elections.

For the ruling party, the impeachment of Gachagua could also signal internal divisions and a struggle for control within its ranks. As Gachagua prepares to defend himself, questions will undoubtedly arise about the unity and stability of the government, especially given the potential for further political fallout.

Conversely, if the impeachment motion fails, it could embolden Gachagua and his supporters, reinforcing his claims of political persecution and cementing his position as a key figure in Kenya’s political landscape. Such an outcome could also have implications for his future political ambitions, including a potential run for the presidency.

Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Gachagua and Kenyan Politics

As the impeachment motion looms, Rigathi Gachagua faces one of the most significant challenges of his political career. The allegations surrounding the lease of the TreeTops Hotel, combined with the charges of constitutional violations and asset acquisition, have placed him at the center of a political storm. Whether the motion passes or fails, the outcome will undoubtedly shape the future of Kenyan politics in the coming months.

For now, Gachagua remains resolute, denying the allegations and preparing to defend himself both in Parliament and in the court of public opinion. As the political drama unfolds, all eyes will be on Tuesday’s proceedings in the National Assembly, where the fate of Kenya’s Deputy President will hang in the balance.