Caleb Amisi, the outspoken Member of Parliament representing Saboti constituency, has disclosed that despite his tenure in office, he has never crossed paths with President William Ruto. The revelation sheds light on the deep-seated ideological disparities between the two leaders and raises questions about the nature of political engagement in Kenya.
Amisi’s assertion, made during a recent interview, underscores a stark contrast in personal and leadership values between himself and the head of state. “I can never be invited. They invite all MPs except Caleb Amisi,” he remarked, emphasizing the apparent exclusion he faces from presidential gatherings. He attributes this isolation to fundamental differences in principles, characterizing their compatibility as “like day and night.”
The Saboti MP’s claims extend beyond mere absence from official meetings at State House or other State Lodges; he alleges a deliberate exclusion owing to concerns that his presence might cause embarrassment. “They never call me to such meetings because they know I’ll embarrass the president,” Amisi asserted. He further insinuates a transactional motive behind the interactions of other leaders from the Western Region, suggesting that their proximity to President Ruto is driven solely by personal gain rather than genuine alignment of values.
Amisi’s remarks carry weight, especially considering the broader political landscape characterized by shifting alliances and strategic maneuvering. The assertion of being sidelined due to ideological differences challenges the prevailing narrative of unity and inclusivity within Kenya’s political spectrum. It also raises pertinent questions about the nature of representation and the extent to which personal convictions influence political engagement.
Moreover, Amisi’s critique of leaders cozying up to the head of state for personal interests underscores the perennial issue of political patronage and its impact on governance. By calling out the opportunistic tendencies of some regional leaders, he highlights the need for integrity and principled leadership in navigating Kenya’s complex political terrain.
However, while Amisi’s revelations offer insight into the dynamics of political interaction, they also point to deeper systemic challenges within Kenya’s democratic framework. The apparent exclusion of a duly elected representative from official engagements with the president raises concerns about the inclusivity and transparency of governance processes.
