On Thursday, New Mexico filed a lawsuit against Snap Inc., the parent company of the popular social media app Snapchat, accusing it of failing to protect children from sexual exploitation. The lawsuit, led by New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez, alleges that Snapchat’s policies and design features facilitate the spread of child sexual exploitation material, making it a prime platform for sextortion and other predatory behaviors targeting minors.
The Allegations Against Snapchat
Snapchat, widely used by teens and young adults, is known for its unique feature where messages disappear after 24 hours. However, the lawsuit claims that this feature has created a false sense of security among users, particularly minors, who believe their photos and videos vanish permanently. Torrez argues that this perception is misleading, as predators can easily capture and permanently store explicit content, which is then traded, sold, and circulated indefinitely.
The lawsuit is based on a months-long investigation by the New Mexico Attorney General’s office, which found that Snapchat was frequently used for sextortion—where a predator coerces a minor into sending explicit photos or videos and then threatens to distribute the content unless more sexual content or money is provided. The investigation highlights the ease with which such activities can occur on Snapchat due to its disappearing message feature and lack of robust safeguards.
One alarming discovery from the investigation involved New Mexico’s Department of Justice creating a decoy Snapchat account for a 14-year-old named “Heather.” The account received messages from another account named “child.rape” and other explicitly named profiles, demonstrating how easily minors can be targeted by predators on the platform.
Snap Inc.’s Response
In response to the lawsuit, a Snap spokesperson stated that the company is reviewing the complaint and plans to respond in court. The spokesperson emphasized that Snap Inc. has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in its trust and safety teams and remains committed to working with law enforcement, online safety experts, and other organizations to enhance user safety on its platform.
Snap Inc. has long touted its efforts to protect its younger users, including measures like age verification, artificial intelligence to detect inappropriate content, and partnerships with safety organizations. However, the New Mexico lawsuit suggests these measures are insufficient in preventing the exploitation of minors and calls into question the effectiveness of Snap’s current safety protocols.
The Broader Implications for Social Media Safety
This lawsuit comes amid increasing scrutiny of social media companies and their responsibilities to protect vulnerable users, especially children and teens. Snapchat’s disappearing message feature, while popular, has been criticized for enabling risky behavior and creating opportunities for exploitation. The case in New Mexico highlights a broader challenge facing tech companies: balancing user privacy with the need to safeguard against illegal and harmful activities.
Attorney General Torrez’s lawsuit seeks not only accountability from Snap Inc. but also pushes for stronger protections for children online. In his statement, Torrez condemned Snapchat for creating what he described as a “virtual yearbook” of child sexual images that are traded and stored indefinitely. He argued that Snapchat’s design choices and failure to adequately address these risks have made it a preferred platform for predators.
The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for how social media platforms design their features and enforce safety measures, especially when it comes to protecting minors. It may also prompt further investigations into other social media companies and lead to new regulations aimed at curbing online child exploitation.
As the case progresses, it will be important to watch how Snap Inc. responds and whether it will lead to meaningful changes in the platform’s approach to user safety. In the meantime, the lawsuit serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers lurking on social media and the need for continued vigilance to protect the most vulnerable users.
