English grassroots rugby clubs are being urged to vote for the removal of the Rugby Football Union’s chief executive at an upcoming special general meeting. This follows growing dissatisfaction with the leadership and governance of the sport in England.
The call for change has been led by Nottingham Rugby’s chair, who also co-chairs a group representing clubs across the country. He has issued an open letter urging clubs to back a no-confidence motion, emphasizing the need for reform in the administration of the game. The letter criticizes the current leadership for what it describes as persistent failures and argues that continuing with the status quo would be detrimental to the sport.
Concerns have been raised over the financial state of English rugby, including the collapse of three Premiership clubs and the financial struggles of others. Declining player participation, reduced funding, and unfulfilled commitments to the second-tier Championship are also highlighted as key issues. These concerns have been exacerbated by financial losses within the governing body, alongside executive pay packages that have drawn criticism.
The letter claims that community rugby has been neglected and that decision-makers have become “untouchable.” It also calls for the governing body’s president to step aside from involvement in the meeting, citing a lack of impartiality. The upcoming vote is presented as an opportunity for clubs to take a stand against poor leadership and demand accountability.
The meeting marks a rare moment in the history of the organization, with the last such gathering taking place 25 years ago. The push for change does not end with this motion, as there are plans to introduce further steps aimed at restructuring governance. A second motion targeting the wider board is expected to follow, with an ultimate goal of overhauling the organization’s leadership structure at an upcoming annual general meeting.
While those leading the call for reform have been vocal in their concerns, the governing body has yet to officially respond to the situation. The outcome of the vote will likely have significant implications for the future direction of the sport in England.
