The Rugby Football League (RFL) is facing multiple whistleblowing complaints regarding historical allegations of sexism and misogyny in the workplace. These complaints emerge amidst a turbulent period for the governing body of English rugby league, following the resignation of the chair and three female directors, as well as the appointment of a new head to lead a strategic review of the sport.
Several formal complaints have surfaced over the past fortnight, accusing the organization of fostering a sexist culture and tolerating misogynistic language. These concerns have reached Sport England, which provides significant government funding to the RFL, with senior officials closely monitoring the situation. The developments have also drawn attention from international stakeholders, with Australia’s National Rugby League expressing dissatisfaction with the recent board changes, leading to concerns about the impact on future investment in Super League. Additionally, the International Rugby League board is considering removing England’s representation from the global governing body.
The complaints were submitted anonymously through the RFL’s whistleblowing email, and the chief executive has acknowledged their seriousness. Staff members have been encouraged to report any further concerns either in person or through the established whistleblowing channels. Although no formal investigation has been initiated yet, it is expected that the governing body will launch one in accordance with its policies.
These allegations follow a letter circulated by individuals identifying as “The Women of the RFL and RL Commercial,” which outlined instances of misogyny, bullying, and dismissive treatment of women within the organization. The letter detailed patterns of inappropriate behavior, including derogatory comments and actions by certain figures in the sport, and highlighted public instances of female professionals being belittled and disrespected.
The governance crisis has been exacerbated by internal conflicts, leading to significant leadership changes. The previous chair resigned, alongside three female directors, amid a struggle for control over the direction of the sport. In response, a club-led strategic review was launched, led by a former chief executive who was backed by several clubs discontented with the existing leadership. The dissatisfaction stemmed from concerns over the declining value of broadcast contracts and the financial troubles of certain clubs.
Prior to these leadership changes, the RFL had warned clubs that reinstating figures with previous affiliations to club ownership could lead to governance breaches. The appointment of an interim board was necessary to maintain compliance with Sport England’s governance code, ensuring a balance of independent non-executive directors. This board is set to meet for the first time in early April to address the ongoing issues.
The controversy has also affected international relations, with Australian rugby league officials questioning the stability of the RFL’s leadership. Their concerns come at a critical moment, as discussions had been underway regarding potential investment in Super League following a successful promotional event in Las Vegas. The leadership turmoil and internal divisions are seen as a major setback for these negotiations.
There are also implications for England’s presence in international rugby league governance. The recent resignation of the RFL chair has left a vacant seat on the International Rugby League board, and there are indications that this position may not be filled. This could further weaken England’s influence in global decision-making at a time when the sport is seeking to expand its international profile.
The RFL’s next steps will be crucial in determining how the organization addresses these concerns. With pressure mounting from multiple directions, the governing body must navigate its internal challenges while maintaining its credibility on both national and international levels.
