The CEO of the Women’s Super League and Championship has ruled out scrapping promotion and relegation altogether but did not dismiss the possibility of a temporary relegation pause as part of expansion plans for the top two divisions.
One of the options being considered is a four-year pause on relegation, allowing the leagues to grow to 16 teams each. Despite concerns that such a move could threaten the competitive balance of the league, Nikki Doucet, CEO of Women’s Professional Leagues Limited (WPLL), emphasized the importance of promotion and relegation in English football. She stated that it remains a defining feature of the sport and an essential factor in maintaining excitement and competitiveness.
Doucet acknowledged the need to ensure the league remains attractive for club investors while upholding the core principles of the game. She stressed that exploring all options was necessary to build the most competitive and entertaining women’s football competition globally while supporting the wider football pyramid.
In response to criticism over possible changes to promotion and relegation, WPLL’s chief operating officer, Holly Murdoch, confirmed that fan groups would be included in discussions. She explained that the process was still in the early stages and that formal and informal consultations would take place once concrete proposals were developed.
At the end of the season, clubs will vote on whether to suspend relegation. However, the final decision does not rest solely with WPLL. Any changes affecting the league structure from the 2026-27 season onward must be approved by the Football Association board before the August 1 deadline.
Mark Bullingham, the FA’s chief executive, made it clear that a closed league would not be accepted. He acknowledged the difference between eliminating relegation permanently and allowing the league to expand through promotion while suspending relegation. He indicated that the FA might support a broader package of reforms if it benefits the women’s game overall, including improvements to academies, minimum standards, and player pathways.
Despite ongoing discussions, WPLL has not disclosed specific details about what is under consideration, maintaining confidentiality over private shareholder meetings. The debate continues, with the future structure of the WSL and Championship likely to remain a contentious issue among fans, clubs, and governing bodies.
