The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled 6-3 in favor of upholding local ordinances that criminalize sleeping in public and homeless encampments, a decision that directly affects cities like San Antonio. The case, originating from Grants Pass, Oregon, questioned whether penalizing individuals experiencing homelessness for public camping violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment.”
Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, emphasized that the Eighth Amendment does not grant federal judges the authority to dictate homelessness policy, leaving such decisions to local jurisdictions. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that criminalizing sleep when there are no alternatives effectively forces individuals to choose between staying awake or facing arrest.
In San Antonio, public camping without a permit has been banned since 2005, carrying penalties of up to a $500 fine for violations. Despite the ruling, local officials and advocates stress that homelessness cannot be solved by criminalization alone. They emphasize the importance of continuing efforts to provide permanent housing solutions, prevent homelessness, and sustain the city’s response system for those in need.
The city has recently seen an increase in homelessness, with a point-in-time count revealing a 6.8% rise in homeless individuals in Bexar County compared to the previous year. This underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing enforcement of local ordinances with compassionate approaches to addressing homelessness through supportive housing and services.
This ruling has sparked ongoing discussions and concerns among community groups, advocates, and officials in San Antonio about the best approaches to support and address the needs of individuals experiencing homelessness while adhering to legal frameworks and community priorities.
Is there anything specific you’d like to know more about or any other details you’re interested in exploring?
