Western powers, including the U.S., France, and Germany, have expressed concerns over Syria’s new Islamist leadership appointing foreign jihadists to senior military positions. These appointments, according to Western officials, could harm Syria’s efforts to establish international credibility and pose significant security risks.
The warnings were delivered during separate meetings between Western envoys and Syria’s de facto leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in December 2023. The U.S. envoy, Daniel Rubinstein, highlighted concerns that such appointments could tarnish Syria’s image abroad. French and German foreign ministers, Jean-Noel Barrot and Annalena Baerbock, echoed these sentiments in discussions with Sharaa on January 3.
Reports reveal that the Syrian administration, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), appointed at least six foreign fighters, including individuals from China, Turkey, Egypt, and Jordan, to senior military ranks. These fighters, who had contributed significantly to the overthrow of Assad, were rewarded with positions such as brigadier-general and colonel.
Western nations view foreign fighters as a security threat, fearing that their combat experience in Syria could later be used to orchestrate attacks in their home countries. The Syrian administration, however, defended the appointments, stating that these fighters had become integral to Syrian society after years of sacrifice. Officials suggested that repatriating them could lead to persecution, making integration into the Syrian military a more viable option.
Diplomats from Western and Arab nations remain wary of Syria’s leadership and its approach to governance. While these countries aim to foster a more inclusive political transition and counter Iranian influence, they oppose moves that may embolden transnational jihadist groups.
Experts believe Syria’s decision is an attempt to stabilize the country by keeping foreign fighters under control. However, global and local risks remain, as Syria’s new rulers navigate the delicate task of balancing competing internal and external demands. The situation underscores the broader challenge of managing the fallout from a decade-long civil war while addressing international security concerns.
