Kenyan counties are facing significant financial setbacks due to inefficiencies and fragmentation in their revenue collection systems. According to Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) Commissioner General Humphrey Wattanga, these disjointed systems are creating leakages that are costing counties billions of shillings annually. At a recent Senate ICT committee meeting, Wattanga highlighted how the deployment of a unified Integrated County Revenue Management System (ICRMS) could address these issues, thereby enhancing county revenue and benefiting both county and national governments.
The Problem with Fragmented Revenue Collection Systems
Currently, counties use a variety of disjointed systems for revenue collection, often contracting third-party financial technology (fintech) firms to automate or directly manage this process. This diversity in systems has resulted in inconsistencies, with some counties still reliant on outdated systems that trace back to the defunct local authorities. These legacy systems are not only technologically outdated but also operate independently, creating compatibility issues that hinder seamless integration with other financial operations.
This reliance on disparate systems has led to frequent system downtimes, disrupting revenue collection processes and inconveniencing county customers. During the Senate ICT committee meeting, Wattanga pointed out that these downtimes reduce revenue collection efficiency, leading to missed opportunities and financial losses. The committee, chaired by Trans Nzoia Senator Allan Chesang, is currently reviewing the effectiveness of these systems to identify areas for improvement.
The Role of Fintech Firms and Auditor General’s Concerns
In a bid to modernize, many counties have outsourced revenue collection to private fintech firms, hoping that automation would improve efficiency. However, this approach has sparked concerns over the accuracy of revenue figures reported by these firms. Some Senators have raised concerns that these outsourced arrangements are siphoning funds from counties due to potential discrepancies in reported revenue and a lack of regular audits. Nandi Senator Samson Cherargei argued that counties may struggle to take KRA’s recommendations seriously given that KRA itself has failed to meet its own revenue targets in recent years.
To address these issues, Senators are urging Auditor General Nancy Gathungu to audit these revenue collection firms. The move seeks to ensure transparency and accountability, reducing the likelihood of financial leakages. The absence of an audit has created a potential loophole, leaving room for siphoning of billions of shillings from the counties. Senators believe that regular auditing could bring these figures in line, preventing revenue shortfalls in county finances.
Costs and Challenges with Private Vendors
Counties that contract external vendors often pay a percentage of the revenue collected as a fee, which can be unreasonably high and eats into the revenue meant for public service delivery. KRA highlighted that counties also face challenges with system procurement, with many experiencing ambiguous requirements and vendor-led contracting processes that may not align with county needs. This dependency on vendors for system management and maintenance has put counties in a financially unsustainable position.
Moreover, some counties have not yet adopted any form of automation, opting to collect revenue manually. This manual process is prone to human error and inefficiencies, exacerbating the financial challenges already faced by counties. The lack of a standardized approach has hampered the effectiveness of county revenue collection and created a pressing need for a more efficient solution.
KRA’s Proposed Solution: A Unified System
In response to these challenges, KRA is advocating for the adoption of a single Integrated County Revenue Management System (ICRMS) that could be implemented across all counties. According to Wattanga, this unified approach could standardize revenue administration processes, streamline collections, and reduce the impact of downtimes. A central system would also enable better monitoring, reducing the risks associated with revenue leaks and discrepancies.
Additionally, an ICRMS could ease the procurement burden on counties by providing a comprehensive, standardized platform that doesn’t require reliance on multiple vendors. It could also ensure that a larger percentage of revenue goes back into county services instead of being diverted to high vendor fees. Beyond improved efficiency, the adoption of a single system across counties would foster transparency and reliability, reducing dependence on private contractors.
Moving Forward: Addressing Skepticism and Implementation Challenges
The proposal for an integrated system is not without its challenges. Some counties are wary of KRA’s recommendations, especially given its own struggles to meet national revenue targets. Addressing these concerns is crucial if KRA hopes to build trust with county administrations. Demonstrating the system’s effectiveness through pilot programs or phased rollouts could help mitigate concerns and showcase the potential for increased revenue.
Counties must also consider the logistical and financial implications of transitioning to a new system. Many will need technical support and funding to make the switch from legacy systems or manual collection methods to a digital, standardized approach. Legislative and administrative support will be essential in facilitating a smooth transition.
Conclusion
The revenue collection challenges facing Kenya’s counties underscore the need for a robust, integrated solution that can close the loopholes currently costing billions of shillings in lost revenue. KRA’s proposal for a unified system presents a viable path forward, offering both enhanced transparency and operational efficiency. However, gaining county buy-in and addressing implementation concerns will be key to ensuring this system’s success. With the Senate ICT committee actively reviewing these issues, the hope is that Kenya’s counties can soon adopt a streamlined revenue management approach, ultimately strengthening their financial stability and capacity to serve their communities effectively.