President Donald Trump has taken a harder stance against Russian President Vladimir Putin, expressing anger over stalled ceasefire negotiations in Ukraine. In a recent interview with NBC News, President Trump stated he was “very angry” and “pissed off” with Putin for attacking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s credibility. He warned of severe economic consequences, including a potential 50% tariff on countries purchasing Russian oil, if a peace agreement is not reached.
President Trump’s remarks mark a departure from his previously accommodating approach toward the Kremlin. Over the past six weeks, he has reportedly pressured Zelensky for concessions while maintaining a favorable stance toward Putin. However, his latest comments signal a shift, with President Trump stating that he would hold Russia accountable if it were found responsible for continued hostilities.
“If Russia and I are unable to make a deal on stopping the bloodshed in Ukraine, and if I think it was Russia’s fault – which it might not be… I am going to put secondary tariffs on all oil coming out of Russia,” President Trump declared.
Secondary tariffs, which could reach 50%, would target nations still importing Russian oil, primarily affecting China and India, the largest buyers. The U.S. has not previously imposed such aggressive financial measures, making this a significant development in global diplomacy.
Zelensky responded via social media, condemning Russia’s continued aggression and warning of the dangers of prolonged war. He urged the U.S. and European allies to take firm action against Putin’s strategies, which he claimed echo Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014.
President Trump’s latest remarks also included threats against Iran, warning of severe military action if the country does not engage in negotiations over its nuclear program. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian responded by stating that while direct talks with Washington were not an option, indirect discussions could be considered if trust could be restored.
President Trump’s hardline rhetoric suggests a potential shift in U.S. foreign policy should he return to office, with increased economic and military threats aimed at adversaries. As negotiations unfold, global leaders will closely watch whether his words translate into concrete actions.
